Follow us!

    Re: Your comments were included in the publication of book s

    Posted by yustas on 4/27/04

    On 9/23/03, yustas wrote:
    > Your comments were included in the publication of book
    > series dedicated to Gleitzeit art of Paul Jaisini.
    >
    > Thank you for contributing,
    > Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb,
    > New York
    > http://www.lulu.com/Paul-Jaisini
    > http://www.lulu.com/content/15856
    >
    > Title: Blue Reincarnation (Narcissus) by Jaisini
    > Author: yustas kotz-gottlieb
    > Category: Books > New Age & Alternative > New Thought
    > Copyright Year: © 2003
    > Description: You just have to read this book to believe
    > what people could come up with commenting on the artwork of
    > Paul Jaisini. You would be able to see how people
    > manipulate opinion, satisfy own egos, attempt to antagonize
    > not the subject at hand, not the description of the
    > painting, but the quality of the artist's work they never
    > had a chance to see. You could probably use a few good
    > laughs and I guarantee that you'll get more than just a few
    > from this book, unusual, never written before. First of its
    > kind. (140 pages)
    >
    > Title: Gleitzeit Art Jaisini
    > Author: yustas kotz-gottlieb
    > Category: Books > New Age & Alternative > New Thought
    > Copyright Year: © 2003
    > Description: The adventure of art is also illustrative of
    > endless capacities in self-promotion, new ideas in
    > communicative arts, experimental networking and virtues of
    > industriousness when most intangible art such as gleitzeit
    > art of Paul Jaisini becomes commodified by interest and
    > active involvement of the public. (437 pages)
    >
    > Title: Drunken Santa by Jaisini
    > Author: yustas kotz-gottlieb
    > Category: Books > New Age & Alternative > New Thought
    > Copyright Year: © 2003
    > Description: An amazing tale one after another with enigma
    > piled on secrets stacked on riddles provided in art works
    > of Paul Jaisini. (101 pages)
    >
    > Title: Marble Lady oil painting by Jaisini
    > Author: yustas kotz-gottlieb
    > Category: Books > New Age & Alternative > New Thought
    > Copyright Year: © 2003
    > Description: The first installment in Yustas Kotz-
    > Gottlieb's monograph, Art of Paul Jaisini book series. (238
    > pages)
    >
    >
    > Title: Jaisini Marble Lady-2
    > Author: yustas kotz-gottlieb
    > Category: Books > New Age & Alternative > New Thought
    > Copyright Year: © 2003
    > Description: Jaisini monograph heralds the arrival of a new
    > genre of narration revolutionary approach of multi-voiced
    > author who speaks thought the voices of people contributed
    > to the book in real time. (215 pages)
    >
    > Title: Jaisini Marble Lady-3
    >
    > Author: yustas kotz-gottlieb
    > Category: Books > New Age & Alternative > New Thought
    > Copyright Year: © 2003
    > Description: Art book series where Kotz-Gottlieb
    > demonstrates that art, sensuality, healing capacity of art
    > and communication, and hope to discover new dimension are
    > eternally intertwined and universal. (230 pages)


    Jaisini "Marble Lady"

    Marble Woman, The Notorious Marble Lady, My Marble Lady, Lady
    Known as Marble, the So-Called Marble Lady, etc.

    Art in the twentieth century has been awarded the highest
    esteem as something we should admire and respect and I found
    a lot of evidence of the truthfulness of such thought. I
    emailed my essay called "Marble Lady" on Paul Jaisini’s oil
    painting with the same title in frequency of 500-1000 emails
    a day with a limited impact in consideration to the vast
    amount of Internet subscribers.

    What I have found was an unprecedented response from the
    recipients, the readers who were intrigued and even entrapped
    by this sort of a psychological game, trying to decipher the
    meaning of the message, it’s content, how it relates to them
    personally, who is the messenger, why was it sent to them and
    why they were targeted to such atypical advertisement.

    I did not expect such amount of feedback, which kept me busy
    for months. It also was a degree of obligation to continue as
    the action had caught public’s interest. This art mission
    grew into a sort of conceptual art when I am describing an
    oil painting authored by Jaisini without providing any visual
    information.

    It seems to me that this was one of the reasons for creation
    of fancy about the given art work that was named by readers
    in many special ways as The Marble Lady, Marble Woman, The
    Notorious Marble Lady, My marble lady, lady Known as Marble,
    the so-called marble lady, Marble Statue and so forth.

    It is some sort of phenomenon of the essay hitting
    unexpectedly PC users, as some preserved, sacred message,
    which is not revealed but represented as an idea and
    mysterious message from ‘above.’

    I didn’t intend to engage in conceptual art activity, but it
    happened without my insinuation. People had started the
    dialogue that can only be called interaction. I was asked for
    explanation. A work of art normally behaves as if it’s a
    visual statement. This is a sculpture of Thinker by Rodin or
    this is a portrait of Mona Lisa. The viewer may ask, who was
    this Mona Lisa and why did she become so precious. But these
    questions follow on from an acceptance of the visual object.

    In my case, there was no visual object offered for review,
    but an essay as ipso facto. And the visualization was up to
    the reader. I offered the description as representation,
    which seems a tautology and the chain of description was
    further elaborated by each reader in his degree of potential
    and "Marble lady" was "Marble lady" was "marble lady" ed
    infinitum.

    The response could also be believed as nervous breakdown
    characteristic of contemporary people who have lost faith in
    any offered commodity, nor in art claimed to be, neither in
    social institution.

    The connection of image with effective action on viewers is
    disturbed. People seem to prefer a legend. The formalistic
    presentation can no longer explain life in our rapidly
    changing world. To the opposite of a true conceptual art
    which was a violent reaction against modernist notions of
    progress, this new action was populist and not against an art
    object status, but for creation of an aura of legend and good
    reception.

    This action thus is purely aesthetic without discrimination
    of the recipients. I have received responses ranging from
    teen-agers to retired journalists. The romantic, poetic
    message reached throughout the cyber space with little effort
    in professionalism of presentation, but with a strong power
    of personal correspondence.

    The reader can find in the essay the artistic representation
    with no political or apolitical aspiration. The conceptuality
    of this action is even more paradoxical as in respects of
    certain degree of privacy’s intrusion.

    With emailing an art essay I was trying to impose art on non-
    wanting receptors unlike the denial of Conceptual art and
    it’s opposition towards art tradition.

    The reception of the message "Marble Lady" turned to be the
    best. It may be the method of this everyday nature that
    prefigured good reception of the one who got the mail in the
    box. If he reads an art essay in a snobby art magazine
    written with the same artsy words, it would not reach him.

    Instead of usual commercial offers the Internet user receives
    the poetic message that he’d love to think has come from some
    one he knows personally, or a secret admirer. The expectation
    here is exaggerated and he thinks more of the essay than it
    is realistically. He sees it through the rosy glasses of
    sensual willingness. This may be the highest point of a
    fusing the life of the home, office, classroom with the
    hermetic life of the art studio, by the help of informative
    mediator.

    The essay sneaked onto the recipient without any commercial
    tyranny as personal letter. The reader chooses to open and
    read it.

    The reason of course is the title "Marble Lady." Naming the
    essay with the painting’s title "Marble Lady" I tried to put
    the painting at the service of the mind. Duchamp rejected no
    painting per se, but stupid painting. I found a chance for
    critical research in works of Paul Jaisini, which allow me to
    think in words and images. Jaisini’s paintings are smart
    enough to teach, to reconstruct the mind and start up a new
    art concept.

    The written essay cannot substitute the visual image and by
    no definition can be called an independent work of art, but
    its art’s aura. It didn’t intend to create a debate, but
    ultimately did, the aura is important in the pleasurable
    straight reception of visual art work by people.

    New York 2004
    Text Copyright: Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb

    Marble Lady by Jaisini
    Blue Reincarnation Narcussis by Jaisini
    911 oil painting by Jaisini
    Freedom of Thought by Jaisini
    Hot Dog Party by Jaisini
    Drunken Santa by Jaisini
    Pinocchio by Jaisini
    Wet Dream by Jaisini

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Your comments were included in the publication of book serie, 9/23/03, by yustas.
  • Re: Your comments were included in the publication of book s, 4/27/04, by yustas.
  • Re: Your comments were included in the publication of book s, 7/23/04, by Irin.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.