Re: EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE - I NEED SOME INPUT
Posted by fran griner, gfgriner@aol.com, on 11/27/03
On 11/16/03, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote: > Dear Counsel.Net Friends, > > In Louisiana once a defendant pleads guilty or is > convicted after trial and put on probation, he is subject > to being arrested without even a warrant by his probation > officer for "probation violation". Seems to me like > probation officers delight in doing this. Once arrested > for probation violation, a probationer may or may not be > allowed bond pending his "probation hearing." I am sure > that a probationer is not entitled as a matter of absolute > right to be released on bond pending his probation hearing > on the issue of revocation. However, since some > probationers who have been so arrested for probtion > violation are indeed admitted to bail pending their > probation revocation hearing, I think that under > the "equal protection" clause of the U.S. Constitution all > such probationers must be so admitted to bail. Of course, > the court may set the bond in any amount it feels > necessary to assure the appearance of the defendant, but I > argue that if it allows some to be bonded out awaiting the > hearing, then it must allow all defendants to be admitted > to bail; and to grant this privilege to some and to deny > it to others is a violation of the "equal protection" > clause. What do you think? > > Sincerely, > > Hardy Parkerson, Atty. > Lake Charles, LA > hmparkerson@bigfoot.com >
Posts on this thread, including this one
- EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE - I NEED SOME INPUT, 11/16/03, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE - I NEED SOME INPUT, 11/27/03, by fran griner.
- Re: EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE - I NEED SOME INPUT, 11/27/03, by fran griner.
- Re: EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE - I NEED SOME INPUT, 11/27/03, by Turtle.
- Re: EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE - I NEED SOME INPUT, 4/01/12, by Rachael Phipps.
|