Re: This is a LAW STUDENTS chat, not a policy chat.

More | Report Post

Your right. I DO care. About LAW SCHOOL. Not about real world
scenarios. Not that things like that is not important, I just
don't like wasting my time opening up postings that have
absolutely NOTHING to do with law school on a chat for law
students.

Unlike many people, I care about this chat and check it almost
every day if not every other day. It has been about twenty days
since I wrote that post, and you are responding to it today? I
don't really recall you contributing much to the law students
chat with any law student issues. By continually posting non-law
student related posts, law students and those interested in law
school will leave the sight. I don't want that to happen. Lets
keep this a good site.

Crown Prince

On 5/21/07, Someone that cares wrote:
> On 5/02/07, Crown Prince wrote:
>> With all due respect,
>>
>> Many, if not most of us, come to this LAW STUDENTS chat to
>> discuss law school issues, not legal or policy matters that
>> don't pertain to the practice of law or the legal profession.
>>
>> Please find another place to post or chat. Reading your
>> postings wastes my time and the time of others.
>>
>> CP
>>
>>
>>it seems that you are the only one bothered, so maybe you
> shold open your own site.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/01/07, Jack wrote:
>>> A family is accused and goes through the DYFS evaluation
>>> process and comes out with no problem . The social worker
>>> is actually upset because she "has real cases that need to
>>> be addressed" . The family is reported a second time and
>>> the same social worker says this is somebody out to get the
>>> family. Does the family have any recourse ? My friends are
>>> good people and this seems to be a witch hunt. As far as I
>>> can tell there is nothing they can do other than go through
>>> repeated evaluations. This will be the 4th occurance and
>>> the Social Worker has advised there is nothing they can do.
>>> If anybody knows how to prevent this please respond