Re: Learning Disability

More | Report Post

On 7/17/08, meka wrote:
> On 7/16/08, Patricia wrote:
>> On 7/16/08, -- wrote:
>>> On 7/16/08, Curmudgeon wrote:
>>>
>>> I have labeled each sentence of Curmudgeon's last post. [inside brackets]
>>>
>>> I made no assumptions. [Unsupported statement] I looked at your horrible
>>> spelling and grammar. [Observation with judgmental adjective] Those were
>>> the visible evidence of your abilities or lack thereof. [Summary conclusion;
>>> clumsy mixing of a plural pronoun with singular and plural nouns] But I
>>> guess you want to play "victim" and blame your incompetence on being dark
>>> skinned. [Assumption] I personally do not think skin color has anything
>>> to do with one's intelligence. [Self serving statement of a politically
>>> correct attitude, like saying "Why some of my best friends are black]
>>
>> Response to Curmudgeon: I see you are trying to be as 'inflammatory' as my
>> superior nurse. This is not about you. I gave no credence to her statement;
>> how much less will I give to you? She is heading for the court system. This
>> is about who else has been labelled as 'learning disability'.
>
> Mr. C: 'judge not, less ye be judged'

I think I read somewhere where a famous man mispelled 'potato' and much (silly)
ado was made about it. But the man is still famous (Quayle). Mispelled words on
a blog is evidence of nothing but what it is. That is such a goofy thing to say
about a person.