Re: IMPRISONED FOR "DRIVING A NICE CAR IN A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD

More | Report Post

On 7/25/08, -- wrote:
> On 7/25/08, JAP wrote:
>> According to arresting police officers testimony during
>> trial by jury they dais that I was initially pluued over
>> for "driving a nice car in a bad neighborhood". What does
>> this constitute? The crime lab testified that the
>> evidence that was used to convict was not turned in until
>> three days after incarceration. After the trial the
>> appointed attorney testified that he was "told not to
>> defend"???
>>
>> O.K. Students what is the problem and the answer to
>> remedy this conspiracy???
>
> Obviously you need to appeal the conviction. That is why we
> have an appellate system. (Make sure the appeal notice is
> filed within 20 days of the conviction.) Good luck.

Hey!! That has been done already. Do the ends justify the
means? Where are the attorney's that actually look at what
took place to get the conviction? It is far more criminal to
break the law, in order to uphold the law, than to outright
break the law and get caught. One who breaks the law in order
the catch a law breaker, breaks the law first and foremost.
The law does not walk on two feet, nor sit on the fleshly
cushion of a rear end...does it? Since when does a person get
sent to prison for "driving a nice car" that rightfully
belongs to them? Since when does chronological order of
events not matter?