Follow us!

    Re: ERA War and the Draft

    Posted by Jayne Cucchiara, jfcucchiara@aol.com, on 10/22/01

    On 10/18/01, Chet wrote:
    > Where does Selective Service [the Draft] stand in respect
    > the ERA. Will women be drafted? Now they are not subject to
    > register. As soon as a boy turns 18 he gets a notice that
    > its a crime to fail to register.

    The Military Selective Service Act, 50 USC Sec. 451, requires
    virtually all men, ages 18 through 25, to register through
    the Selective Service registration process. In 1973, the Act
    was amended to preclude conscription and in 1975 Registration
    for the Draft was discontinued by Presidential Proclamation.
    In 1980, in response to the situation in Iraq, registration
    under the Act was reactivated at the request of then
    President Jummy Carter. At the same time Presendent Carter
    requested reactivation of the Act's registration
    requirements, he also asked Congress to amend the Act to
    provide for the registration and potential conscription of
    women.

    Congress declined to amend the act to include women, but did
    reactive the registration obligation for young men. In
    reaching this conclusion, Congress relied on the fact that
    women were excluded from serving in combat roles in every
    branch of the service as that time in history. Since the
    purpose of registration was to maintain a pool of potential
    soldiers who could be conscripted for combat in the event of
    national need, the fact that women were not allowed to serve
    in combat roles led Congress to conclude their was no reason
    to have women register.

    In Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981), a group of young
    men challenged the reactivated Selective Service registration
    law, arguing that its exclusion of women violated their due
    process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
    Constitution. The trial court agreed, but the U.S. Supreme
    Court reversed the trial court's decision and held that the
    exclusion of women from the Selective Service registration
    requirements was justified because men and women were not
    similarly situated in regards to military service since women
    are excluded from combat service.

    At President Clinton's request, the Department of Defense
    reviewed this issue again in 1994. The DoD noted that
    America's prior drafts were used to supply adequate numbers
    of Army ground combat troops. Because women are excluded by
    policy from front line combat positions, excluding them from
    the draft process remained justifiable in the DoD's view. The
    DoD recognized, however, that policies regarding women need
    to be reviewed periodically because the role of women in the
    military continues to expand.

    Although not subject to the registration and potential
    conscription requirements of the Selective Service Act, women
    have voluntarily served in the U.S. military since the
    Revolutionary War. The Women's Armed Services Integration
    Act, passed in 1948, authorized regular and reserve status
    for women in the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps.
    Before then, and except for nurses, women could not serve in
    the regular armed forces in peacetime. By the end of the 20th
    century, about 200,000 women were serving in on active duty,
    accounting for approximately 14 percent of our armed force.
    Another near quarter million women serve in the reserve
    components, comprising about 15 percent of their strength.
    The DoD report recognized the vastly increased role being
    played by women in each of the Armed Services who, in Fiscal
    Year 1994, comprised 16 percent of recruits. "Because of this
    change in the makeup of the Armed Forces," the report
    observed, "much of the congressional debate which, in the
    court’s opinion [in Rostker], provided adequate congressional
    scrutiny of the issue...(in 1981) would be inappropriate
    today." The DOD review concluded "the success of the military
    will increasingly depend upon the participation of women."

    The Equal Rights Amendment was first proposed in 1923.
    Although it was never ratified by the requisite number of
    states (38), it was ratified by 35 states and has been has
    been reintroduced into every Congress since its June 30,
    1982 ratification deadline. The ERA states simply:

    Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be
    denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on
    account of sex.

    Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by
    appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

    Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after
    the date of ratification.

    Whether the eventual passage of the ERA will provide a
    constitutional basis for requiring equality of treatment
    between men and women with regards to the Selective Service
    act's registration and potential conscription provisions
    remains to be seen.

    I served in the Army 1981-1984. Women I met in the military
    wanted equality and very much wanted the opportunity to serve
    in all military occupations, including combat. Female
    soldiers not only share patriotism with their male
    counterparts, they also share career aspirations which are
    often significantly impeded by their exclusion from combat
    assignments.

    As a woman, an Army veteran, and an attorney, I support the
    passage of the Equal Rights Amendment; I support an amendment
    to the Selective Service Act to require the registration and
    potential conscription of women along with their male peers;
    and I support an end to the DoD exclusion of women from
    combat occupations. Soldiers, whether male or female, should
    be judged on their abilities, not their gender.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • ERA War and the Draft, 10/18/01, by Chet.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 10/22/01, by Jayne Cucchiara.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 9/17/02, by Carole L.Kofahl.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 9/17/02, by Carole L.Kofahl.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 1/05/03, by Dave Behrens.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 8/28/03, by ..
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 9/02/03, by Shmuel Goldstein.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 2/28/04, by Dave Behrens.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 10/13/04, by m.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 12/07/04, by Dave Behrens.
  • Re: ERA War and the Draft, 10/14/05, by S.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.