Re: reverse discrimination.. more info

More | Report Post

On 3/14/02, cbg wrote:
> On 3/14/02, Erik stiles wrote:
>> I FAILED TO MENTION THAT I AM THE ONLY WHITE INDIVIDUAL IN
>> THE OFFICEAND NOBODY IS REPREMANDED IN THE MANNER THAT I AM.
>> OR TOLD TO DO AS MUCH WORK AS I DO.
>> I HAVE NOT EVER SEEN A JOB DESCRIPTION. WHEN ASK FOR ONE THEY
>> TOLD ME ONE DOES NOT EXSIST.
>
> Eric; turn off the caps lock, please. It makes it hard to read.
>
> Okay, now you're giving evidence of illegal discrimination. As
> you are the only white person in the office, it's not going to
> be cut and dried because it will be hard to show a pattern, but
> it's something. Your next step is to call the EEOC and/or your
> state discrimination board and see what they have to say.
>
> By the way, it is not illegal to not have job descriptions.
> They're preferred but not mandated legally.

Sorry Eric, but the EEOC will do absolutely nothing in your case.
Being the only white is not an indication of discrimination. You
would need testimony of other employees who can support your
claims that you were retaliated against for your race. Your
situation is no different then say a man being abused by a
female.

You apparently are an at-will employee subject to the whims of an
abusive employer. Join the club. It is a fact of life that
employers can pretty much do anything they want in your situation.

Re: reverse discrimination.. more info, 9/10/03, by Bella.

Equal Rights Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST