Re: Child Support Enforcement is a Violation of Men's Rights

More | Report Post

On 3/27/02, Darin wrote:
> How can you make a man legally responsible for child
> support when he isn't physically bond by flesh as the
woman
> is? This is a violation of his 14th amendment right to be
> secure in his person, by adding more to his person than he
> is legally responsible for. The woman liberates a part of
> herself at the birth of the child. This can be
> scientifically proven via visual confirmation of the
birth.
>
> Roe vs. Wade established that the child is the woman's
> body, not the man's. This excludes any legal
> responsibility man has to the child. A man has the right
> to be secure in his person, just as the woman does. Women
> were allowed the use of this right in order to terminate
an
> individual after conception, on the basis that the
> individual does not exist, and that all of the physical
> matter surrounding this potential individual is her body
to
> do with as she pleases. This, so called, fact excludes
the
> existence of man's body within the woman, and therefor at
> no point can a man's body be reintroduced into the
equation
> of the individual's existence, because no physical union
> between the man and the born/unborn individual can be
> scientifically measured. Even DNA cannot prove this
> existence WITHOUT simultaneously AFFIRMING conceptual
level
> association, at which point the MURDER of men's children
> could be establish at a genocidal level in our society.
> This then concludes that at no point in the individual's
> existence does the man have any physical responsibility to
> external flesh. Failing to recognize the individual's
> existence at conception, has definitely cause a great
> problem in civilization, hasn't it? All for the rights of
> a WOMAN! The BIG VICTIMS! Victimhood has produce a new
> kind of victim. The victim of the victim. Our Government
> was designed and established to do ONE thing, PROTECT THE
> RIGHTS AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE VIA THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
> FREEDOM, INCLUDING MEN'S! My advice to our wonderful
> Government is to get out of our relationships before it
has
> more than it can deal with.

I read all the responses to this "violation of mens rights"
situation and come to the conclusion that we are supposed
to be created equal but all have very different views. So
the guy believes one thing and you another. I just can't
believe some of you were getting so mad that you had to
insult the guy..... obviously maybe you had bad experiences
with child custody, who knows? My observation is that this
is the guys first child. I have a 15 year old and a nine
year old.... both boys. When my first was born I thought I
was to cool for someone to tell me I had to pay child
support. Whether it be the courts or my sons mother. After
finding that no matter how much I kicked and fussed, I was
getting to know this beautiful little boy that looked just
like me. After awhile all my attention was focused on him
more than myself. You just want to put your arms around them
and never let go... cuz if you do they might get hurt and
that is not an option. So... "if giving support helps to
protect your child so be it!" Give the guy a chance....
unless he is heartless, when he holds his child his mind
WILL change.

Re: Child Support Enforcement is a Violation of Men's Rights, 12/30/11, by Matt schilling.

Equal Rights Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST