ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Equal Rights Chatboard

Hot Now...
Attorney Chat Center
Attorney Classifieds
Attorney Chatboards
Practice Areas
Law Students
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Classified Ads

Re: DYFS degenerate Poem
Posted by Question... on 2/04/06

    Would you mind explaining to us what exactly is: DYFS?

    It seems to me that only Social Workers understand that abreviation
    and the rest of us are in the 'dark'...hmmm


    On 2/04/06, Res Ipsa Locitur wrote:
    > DYFS does not follow the law but Opinion on what is Grave. This is
    > all subjective. Grave danger means to the law a person is to
    > Grievous bodily injury or death. But wait a "social worker" now
    > determins "grave" means being exposed to chores. To verbal
    > discipline. The parents are mentally abusing the child and forcing
    > them to do well in high school. OH DEAR!
    >
    > Now what are the defences to false allegations of DYFS workers or
    > over zealous inexperience "social workers" ?? Is there a law that
    > is violated? Mo so the courts are out of the quention as far
    > ciminal law. Now lets see Tort law "negligence" Intentenal
    > prehaps. But then society dictates what is acceptable behavior not
    > a social worker. Some parts of society push there children to accel
    > such in India, China and Japan. In our own American society some
    > parents do push but this is called abuse.
    >
    > Example True story: Illinios a man's children are taken away
    > because he owned a gun (former correctional officer) Owning a gun is
    > legal in US look at the 2nd Amendment. Social worker "the child saw
    > the gun and saw it being shot this brings up red fags" The man
    > lives in a rural country side. The child is 12 years old and the
    > legal age to hunt. DCFS deemed this abuse and "founded"
    >
    > Watch out farmers, hunters, Police, Military, and Lawyers your
    > children may be taken away from you for having something that is
    > guaranteed by the Constitution all on "Administrative decretion" of
    > do gooders in an office with way too much power.
    >
    > Now DYFS worker
    >
    > On 2/02/06, Clifton wrote:
    >> Please see my earlier post. It was actually in response to your
    >> post. Since you are apparently a social worker, I felt that
    >> perhaps you could give me some useful information or adice to help
    >> the woman's plight that I described in my earlier post.
    >>
    >> On 4/01/04, Victoria wrote:
    >>> On 3/14/04, furious wrote:
    >>>> On 2/02/04, DYFS worker wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> You call DYFS workers degenerates..let me ask you this. Why
    >>>>> are you and your son involved with DYFS? DYFS becomes
    >>>>> involved with families because of abuse and neglect
    >>>>> allegations. So you have a problem with DYFS because someone
    >>>>> made a referral on you for abusing or neglecting your son?
    >>>>> How about you focus on being a good parent and less on the
    >>>>> agency thats trying to help you.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> O dear dyfs worker, aren't you in the wrong place?
    >>>> Just look at that damned dyfs smirk on your face!
    >>>> You dare chastize a man who's been burnt by your group?
    >>>> Everything that you say has the odor of poop.
    >>>> We know you've no feelings, your heart has no beat,
    >>>> You're among hungry wolves and you're the raw meat.
    >>>> You claim "for the children" as root of your quest,
    >>>> But pity the children who feed on your breast!
    >>>> You've dropped off your poison, we've lent you our ear,
    >>>> Now get your fat dyfs ass right out of here!
    >>>>
    >>>> --another dyfs victim
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>> How sad are you.
    >>> Contrary to what people think. I don't want someones child.
    >> More
    >>> work for me. If the child is in grave danger, I remove. I
    >>> worked for DYFS and removed 3 children and it was all becuase
    >>> they were in GRAVE DANGER. You make it seem like I have nothing
    >>> else better to do than to SNATCH your child. Please no, you can
    >>> keep them. You know you did something horrible to your child.
    >>> Especially that it went to court. You know the Judges are not
    >> on
    >>> our side. And DYFS did what it had to do. OHH and also, I do
    >>> have feeling, I have a heart beat. I have cried for the
    >>> children. And I will continue doing my job. If there is
    >>> referral made against anyone, I will be there investigating.
    >>> That is my job. Believe me we don't get bonus (Like some people
    >>> say). BONUS!! HA HA. Extra work without overtime pay sounds
    >>> more like it. Get off you high horse and comply with DYFS.
    >>> Clean up your acts and you won't be a DYFS victim.

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.