ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Legal Ethics Chatboard

Hot Now...
Attorney Chat Center
Attorney Classifieds
Attorney Chatboards
Practice Areas
Law Students
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Classified Ads

Re: Do you know a bad judge?
Posted by Jenny L on 8/01/09

    Albert, A.G. Webber is a bad judge in my opinion. He hates
    Blacks and Latinos. That is bad for all of us.

    On 7/26/07, Terry wrote:
    > SCHICK IS A NO GOOD IN MY OPPNION. That’s why you had your
    guns
    > taken away illegally. Sorry to hear that.
    > Terry
    >
    > Judge Mitchell K. SHICK
    > Republican colleagues of Judge Albert Webber
    > ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT REMOVES ALLEGED RACIST JUDGE WHILE
    > BROTHERS AND SISTERS STILL REMAIN SEGREGATED BY RACE
    >
    >
    > The Illinois Supreme Court has removed Decatur Illinois
    Probate
    > Judge Albert (A.G.) Webber IV from an Illinois woman’s case.
    > Amy Schneider, a mother of five has been in court trying to
    > regain possession of her two oldest children, Kaela Elizabeth
    > Sliney-Schneider and Joshua Matthew Sliney-Schneider, both
    > Caucasian.
    >
    > According to an order issued April 20, 2005, by the Illinois
    > Supreme Court, Charleston, Illinois (Coles County) Fifth
    > Circuit Judge Mitchell K. Shick, a Republican, was assigned to
    > replace Webber in the case. “It’s like something you see on
    TV;
    > Judge Webber operates outside the law, specifically §755 ILCS
    > 5/11-5(b),” says Schneider, “and after Webber is removed his
    > Republican colleagues make sure I am deprived of any access to
    > the court and remain unlawfully stripped of my
    constitutionally
    > protected rights to a parent child relationship.”
    >
    > Schneider, who lives in Normal, Illinois with her three
    younger
    > Black children, has previously filed a complaint with the
    > Judicial Review Board accusing Webber of segregation and
    > racism. “I was not complaining about Judge Webber’s decisions,
    > per se, I was complaining about Judge Webber denying me, a fit
    > parent, due process as required by the constitution,” said
    > Schneider.
    >
    > “Webber went so far as to fabricate derogatory medical and
    > domestic accusations against me to forcibly keep my children
    > with hostile non-parents so I can’t see them at all. However,
    > the sworn testimonies of a valid Illinois medical doctor and
    > two Normal Illinois Police officers directly dispute Webber’s
    > accusations,” said Schneider.
    >
    > “Webber is not only crooked, but he is a malevolent crook,”
    > Schneider said. “Court records will prove Webber used his
    > elected state office to circumvent the law, line the pockets
    of
    > his friends with my children’s money, and manifested racial
    > bigotry to punish me and my young Black children while the
    > Illinois supervising Courts had simply looked the other way,”
    > Schneider claims.
    >
    > “My two children had never been to San Angelo, Texas when they
    > were abducted by Karen M. Coates without permission or the
    > knowledge of any court on August 28, 2002,” Schneider
    > said. “Webber and his Illinois Republican Party friends have
    > closed ranks, and this is nothing more than two children being
    > for sale, purchased and delivered by the Macon County Decatur,
    > Illinois Court for about $250,000.00.”
    >
    > Republican Judge Mitch Schick of the Coles county court
    >> house in Charleston Illinois, has illegally violated general
    >> assembly law 14.5 (a) concerning firearms; he has violated
    >> Illinois, and federal constitutional laws and his oath to
    >> protect the constitution, which is an act of treason. I have
    >> notified the FBI of this matter. Judge MITCH SCHICK is
    >> trying to cover this matter up, hoping it will go away. I
    >> have solid evidence (documentation) from the Coles County
    >> Court house that proves that he illegally seized my two guns
    >> without having any reason to do this illegal act. I had no
    >> criminal recorded anywhere recorded, and he gave me no trial
    >> to defend my self in court by law, he took them before I
    >> even had the chance to show up for my court date to defend
    >> myself, which is a violation of 14.5 (a) Illinois law. He
    >> ordered this action to seize my guns violating every law
    >> written to protect the common citizen. Judge Mitch Shick is
    >> working above the law, and must be accountable for his
    >> actions. I have also notified Senator Dale Righter from
    >> Illinois of this matter. I am waiting to see if he will obey
    >> the law and take proper action. It has been two weeks now
    >> and no response from Righter.
    >>
    >> Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
    >> Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
    >> This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under
    >> color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to
    >> willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person
    >> those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected
    >> by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
    >>
    >> This law further prohibits a person acting under color of
    >> law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully
    >> subject or cause to be subjected any person to different
    >> punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for
    >> punishment of citizens on account of such person being an
    >> alien or by reason of his/her color or race.
    >>
    >> Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by
    >> federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or
    >> limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without
    >> and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided
    >> that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done
    >> under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done
    >> while such official is purporting or pretending to act in
    >> the performance of his/her official duties. This definition
    >> includes, in addition to law enforcement officials,
    >> individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing
    >> Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are
    >> bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.
    >>
    >> Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one
    >> year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts
    >> include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
    >> dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or
    >> imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or
    >> if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,
    >> aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated
    >> sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under
    >> this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
    >> or both, or may be sentenced to death.
    >>
    >> Please if anyone else has been criminally violated by Judge
    >> Mitchell K Schick. Notified the FBI and the Illinois
    >> Judicial Inquiry Board, to file a complaint.
    >>
    >> HB1106 - 11 - LRB095 09700 RLC 29902 b ILLINOIS GENERAL
    >> ASSEMBLY LAW 14.5(a) Protection Order
    >>
    >> 1 When there’s evidence to use firearms illegally against
    >> the petitioner, and the
    >> 2 respondent is present in court, or has failed to appear
    >> 3 after receiving actual notice, the court shall examine on
    >> 4 oath the petitioner, and any witnesses who may be
    >> produced.
    >> 5 If the court is satisfied that there is any danger of the
    >> 6 illegal uses of firearms, it shall include in the order of
    >> 7 protections the requirement that any firearms in the
    >> 8 possession of the respondent, except as provided in
    >> 9 subsections (b), be turned over to the local law
    >> enforcement
    >> 10 agencies for safekeeping. If the respondent fails to
    >> appear,
    >> 11 or refuses or fails to surrender his or her firearms, the
    >> 12 court shall issue a warrant for seizure of any firearm in
    >> 13 the possession of the respondent. The period of
    >> safekeeping
    >> 14 shall be for a stated period of time not to exceed 2
    >> years.
    >> 15 The firearm or firearms shall be returned to the
    >> respondent
    >> 16 at the end of the stated period or at expiration of the
    >> 17 order of protection, whichever is sooner.
    >>
    >> I NEVER GOT A TRIAL TO DEFEND MYSELF IN COURT, AND JUDGE
    >> MITCHELL K SCHICK ORDERED MY TWO GUNS THAT HAD NEVER BEEN
    >> FIRED TO BE SEIZED. HE HAD NO EVIDIENCE TO JUSTFIE THIS
    >> ACTION AGAINST ME. THIS CRIMINAL ACT IS AGAINST EVERY LAW
    >> WRITTEN IN THIS COUNTRY. I HAD NO POLICE RECORD NOTED
    >> ANYWHERE. I SERVED HONROBALLY IN THE ARMY, AIRFORCE; AND
    >> FOUGHT IN THE GULF WAR TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS.
    >> THIS JUDGE IS OUT OF CONTROL AND MUST BE ACCOUTABLE FOR HIS
    >> ACTION. ONE OTHER THING, SENATOR OBAMA OF ILLINOIS, IS
    >> SUPPOSE TO BE LOOKING INTO THIS CRIMINAL ACT AGAINST ME, SO
    >> THERE IS SOME HOPE TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION.
    >>
    >> HERES Another Judge Mitchell K Schick victim read this one:
    >> According to an order issued April 20, 2005, by the Illinois
    >> Supreme Court, Charleston, Illinois (Coles County) Fifth
    >> Circuit Judge Mitchell K. Shick, a Republican, was assigned
    >> to replace Webber in the case. “It’s like something you see
    >> on TV; Judge Webber operates outside the law, specifically
    >> §755 ILCS 5/11-5(b),” says Schneider, “and after Webber is
    >> removed his Republican colleagues make sure I am deprived of
    >> any access to the court and remain unlawfully stripped of my
    >> constitutionally protected rights to a parent child
    >> relationship
    >>

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.