|
|

Re: Driver Responsibility Assessment
Posted by Simi72 on 3/22/09
I too am from out of state and feel that this is extortion. I would be more than happy to get involved with fighting this. Especially with times as they are I know that I can't afford to pay $550 for a license I dont even have (meaning my NY license..I'm from georgia though...) On 12/17/08, Connie wrote: > I too have been caught in this Scam as that is what I see it. I > went to court a year ago for a speeding ticket only to be > informed that the judge wouldn't be there that night and to come > back - well this was an hour away from where I worked so I > tried a couple of times to get back but the dates that I had and > the dates that the court was in session didn't seem to match > up. So I tried calling, left a message, got a call back and a > fine and thought that all was good. Thought that I had mailed > the fine but 7 months later my license was suspended for failure > to show up for a hearing. > > Well we sent another check and waited on getting the suspension > letter back. I had to work so I drove and got pulled over and > got arrested for having a suspended license and failure to yeild > right of way to a cop who was driving over the speed limit and I > didn't see him right away and turned in front of him. This was > right near my house and he wouldn't even let me check the mail > box to see if the return suspension letter was there (which it > was). > > So when I went to court for this ticket and arrest (got the > license suspension arrest dropped), I didn't want to have to > keep coming back to court, as the Assistant DA wasn't there that > night and is only there during morning court sessions (when I > have to be in at work), so I plead quilty and viola got this > invoice in the mail. > > There doesn't seem to be any way out of this and it is linked > real close with DWI surcharges but is separate and distinct, > just based on the same laws that they have been using for years > with DWI. So far I can't figure out why 6 points - 2 tickets > give you six points - even if you plead them down, you still get > charged the points, it only reduces the surcharge and additional > surcharge amounts. > > In addition to this if you do not pay the "Driver Responsibility > Assessment" fee your license will be suspended and a $35 fee is > involved to get it unsuspended this is after you pay any other > fines or fees that you owe first. > > VTL (Vehicle Traffic Law) infraction (except standing, parking, > pedestrian, bicyclist) > > Surcharge is $55 > Additional Surcharge is $20 (I think this is the court fee) > crime victim assistance fee (CVAF) $5 > Town or Village fee $5 > Total fine is minimal of $85 > > A quote from this web site http://www.mcacp.org/issue75.htm > "Thus, where a driver pleads guilty to a traffic ticket, a town > or village justice may conclude that an “unconditional > discharge” or “conditional discharge” is appropriate. But the > person doesn’t leave the courthouse without paying a mandatory > surcharge ($55), additional surcharge ($20), crime victim > assistance fee ($5), and the fee ($5) that town and village > court charge. Total: $85. " > > I paid $115 for the last one. > > -Connie > > Below is the weblink ans some info (surrounded by ****) that > points to the Driver Responsibility Assessment > > http://www.budget.state.ny.us/pubs/archive/fy0405archive/fy0405ar > ticleVIIbills/ted_memo.html#partEbudget > > 2004-2005 NEW YORK STATE EXECUTIVE BUDGET TRANSPORTATION, > ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ARTICLE VII > LEGISLATION MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT > > Part E — Establish a Driver Responsibility Program imposing > additional monetary assessments for drivers convicted of drug or > alcohol-related offenses; or who refuse to submit to chemical > tests; *****or who accumulate six or more points on their > driving records.****** > > Enactment of this bill is necessary to implement the 2004-05 > Executive Budget, which includes $17.5 million in new recurring > revenues associated with these new assessments. These revenues > are slightly offset by the DMV expenditures necessary to > administer the new program. >
|