Re: Child Support

More | Report Post

Only a court can stop child support and ONLY where the court
determines that it is in the child's best interst to do so. It
is only one in a blue moon where child support can be stopped.

Millions of women put a name on the child's birth certificate
because they do not know or do not want the real father's name
pbut on the document. POroving they "falsely" did it is nearly
impossible.

It is a myth that the biological parents can agree amongst
themselves that biomom will waive child support if biodad will
waive visitation. Biomom has no such right to waive child
support. It is the child's right to support from his parents.

I repeat: It is biodad's and biomom's business.

As for the rest of your post: (1) We can agree to disagree.
(2)You are focusing on the wrong thing, madam. It takes two to
create the situation. And pointing a finger at only one of the
two will only get you a tired finger.

On 8/03/07, Lez wrote:
>
>
> Hi Sharwinston,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> Consequences for providing the child support office with a
> null and voided birth certificate with her maiden name listed
> as child's last name and not with the birth certificate where
> the child has the last name of her husband's and signature of
> husband listed as the child's bio-father.
>
> I understand that as biodad he is legally responsible for
> taking care of the child. I agree with you 100 percent.
> However, and my apologies for not including this prior. Biomom
> decided to place un-biodad (husband) on the child's birth
> certificate as the father and not 1,2,3,4 but 5 years later
> decides that she wants to now find out who the child's bio
> father is and keep the child away from him. Biodad had to take
> biomom to court. Biomom told judge she feels because the child
> doesn't know biodad then the biodad should not be able to see
> the child and that her and her husband don't want bio-dad in
> the childs life because child doesn't know him (please keep in
> mind that biodad did not know the child was his because biomom
> told him it was her ex boyfriend's child and she was not heard
> from again until 5 years later.)
>
> If biomom did not want him involved with the child then biomom
> should have kept her mouth shut and left things the way they
> were. It's quite obvious that this was only about money. There
> is something wicked, malicious and vindictive in trying to
> keep a child away from a parent and she waited 5 years later
> after biodad moved on with his life and she as well to come
> back and reak havoc. Her other actions and other behavior
> which I won't get into because that's a whole other chapter
> have caused quite a strain on the family including bio-dad's
> relationship.
>
> Needless to say biomom now regrets everything she did and is
> now saying she should have left things the way they were. Now
> biomom wants to stop child support and is asking biodad if she
> stop child support will he drop his visitation..(The
> Nerve)...again wicked,malicious and vindictive. All of this
> mess and drama to go back to where it was originally. Take
> care Sharwinston.
>
>
> On 8/02/07, sharwinston wrote:
>
> Consequences for what? Pursuing support for a child that
>> biodad is legally obligated to support? Then, none.
>>
>> It appears no law was broken. If the DNA test proved the
>> man to be biodaddy, as appeas to be the cae, then biodaddy
>> has a legal oblgiation to suport his child.
>>
>> I see nothing wicked, malicious or vindictive about pursuing
>> support for a child who is entitled, under the law, to
>> support form his biological father. If you are biodad:
>> shame on you. If you are the significant other of biodad:
>> It's biodad's business.
>>
>> On 8/01/07, Lez wrote:
>>> What are the consequences for a mother after not knowing
>>> who the biological father of her child is do the
>>> following: get married, change the child's last name to
>>> her husband's last name (which he signed)on the birth
>>> certificate, five years later decide to get paternity test
>>> taken, find the biological father, file for child support
>>> and was granted, has two different birth certificates for
>>> the child one with her maiden name the other with husbands
>>> last name, child support office was given the birth
>>> certificate with the maiden name and not the one with the
>>> husbands last name....Can someone please assist me with
>>> this? I have never heard of such wicked, malicious and
>>> vindictive behavior.