Re: Child Support

More | Report Post

Oh just SUTGAD. If you do not like my reponses, then just don't
read them.
The tick's opinion of the Deer matters only to the tick.

On 8/05/07, Lez wrote:
> Hello Sharwinston,
>
> Again thanks for your response, however your RUDE and
> DISRESPECTFUL responses are NOT NECESSARY. It seems as if you have
> taken this to a personal level in which I don't understand because
> it has not impact you or your family in any way. It's my family
> and brother that it has impacted.
>
> I posted to the website merely asking a question(s). In no way was
> I expected to recieve this kind of behavior or treatment from you.
> Based on your responses to me I'm getting the impression that you
> are TRYING to turn this into a combative situation and I WILL NOT
> entertain it any further. If that's what you are looking for then
> please take it someone else. This is a CHAT BOARD not a COMBATIVE,
> SARCASTIC, DISRESPECTFUL and RUDE CHAT BOARD. This website will
> not be visted by me again.
>
> P.S.
>
> My fingers are not tired but your unprofessional behavior is.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/04/07, sharwinston wrote:
>> Only a court can stop child support and ONLY where the court
>> determines that it is in the child's best interst to do so. It
>> is only one in a blue moon where child support can be stopped.
>>
>> Millions of women put a name on the child's birth certificate
>> because they do not know or do not want the real father's name
>> pbut on the document. POroving they "falsely" did it is nearly
>> impossible.
>>
>> It is a myth that the biological parents can agree amongst
>> themselves that biomom will waive child support if biodad will
>> waive visitation. Biomom has no such right to waive child
>> support. It is the child's right to support from his parents.
>>
>> I repeat: It is biodad's and biomom's business.
>>
>> As for the rest of your post: (1) We can agree to disagree.
>> (2)You are focusing on the wrong thing, madam. It takes two to
>> create the situation. And pointing a finger at only one of the
>> two will only get you a tired finger.
>>
>> On 8/03/07, Lez wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Sharwinston,
>>>
>>> thanks for your response.
>>>
>>> Consequences for providing the child support office with a
>>> null and voided birth certificate with her maiden name listed
>>> as child's last name and not with the birth certificate where
>>> the child has the last name of her husband's and signature of
>>> husband listed as the child's bio-father.
>>>
>>> I understand that as biodad he is legally responsible for
>>> taking care of the child. I agree with you 100 percent.
>>> However, and my apologies for not including this prior. Biomom
>>> decided to place un-biodad (husband) on the child's birth
>>> certificate as the father and not 1,2,3,4 but 5 years later
>>> decides that she wants to now find out who the child's bio
>>> father is and keep the child away from him. Biodad had to take
>>> biomom to court. Biomom told judge she feels because the child
>>> doesn't know biodad then the biodad should not be able to see
>>> the child and that her and her husband don't want bio-dad in
>>> the childs life because child doesn't know him (please keep in
>>> mind that biodad did not know the child was his because biomom
>>> told him it was her ex boyfriend's child and she was not heard
>>> from again until 5 years later.)
>>>
>>> If biomom did not want him involved with the child then biomom
>>> should have kept her mouth shut and left things the way they
>>> were. It's quite obvious that this was only about money. There
>>> is something wicked, malicious and vindictive in trying to
>>> keep a child away from a parent and she waited 5 years later
>>> after biodad moved on with his life and she as well to come
>>> back and reak havoc. Her other actions and other behavior
>>> which I won't get into because that's a whole other chapter
>>> have caused quite a strain on the family including bio-dad's
>>> relationship.
>>>
>>> Needless to say biomom now regrets everything she did and is
>>> now saying she should have left things the way they were. Now
>>> biomom wants to stop child support and is asking biodad if she
>>> stop child support will he drop his visitation..(The
>>> Nerve)...again wicked,malicious and vindictive. All of this
>>> mess and drama to go back to where it was originally. Take
>>> care Sharwinston.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/02/07, sharwinston wrote:
>>>
>>> Consequences for what? Pursuing support for a child that
>>>> biodad is legally obligated to support? Then, none.
>>>>
>>>> It appears no law was broken. If the DNA test proved the
>>>> man to be biodaddy, as appeas to be the cae, then biodaddy
>>>> has a legal oblgiation to suport his child.
>>>>
>>>> I see nothing wicked, malicious or vindictive about pursuing
>>>> support for a child who is entitled, under the law, to
>>>> support form his biological father. If you are biodad:
>>>> shame on you. If you are the significant other of biodad:
>>>> It's biodad's business.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/01/07, Lez wrote:
>>>>> What are the consequences for a mother after not knowing
>>>>> who the biological father of her child is do the
>>>>> following: get married, change the child's last name to
>>>>> her husband's last name (which he signed)on the birth
>>>>> certificate, five years later decide to get paternity test
>>>>> taken, find the biological father, file for child support
>>>>> and was granted, has two different birth certificates for
>>>>> the child one with her maiden name the other with husbands
>>>>> last name, child support office was given the birth
>>>>> certificate with the maiden name and not the one with the
>>>>> husbands last name....Can someone please assist me with
>>>>> this? I have never heard of such wicked, malicious and
>>>>> vindictive behavior.