Re: Daughters Employment
Posted by Mike on 9/03/07
I appreciate all serious responses. I Assure you as a business owner myself I am more interesed in preventing frivolous lawsuits than looking for one. I do not know chatboard legalease code and have not tried to imply anything. Maybe I just didnt verbalize myself well. I am simply concerned for my daughters wellfare. And as a former boyscout I believe in being prepared. Thanks and God Bless All. On 9/02/07, Nikki wrote: > What is the point of posting a response just to belittle someone. > Curmudgeon-does it raise your self-esteem to be able to go on a > chatboard and call STRANGERS losers and dumb. You seem to be in > serious need of a good education. And every response to this post > has said there are no grounds to sue. In the original post-it > says "We do not wish to sue" And to Mike-try these websites: > lawguru.com (REAL attorneys answer your questions) > laborlawtalk.com
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/02/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/02/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by v.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/04/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/04/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/04/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/06/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/06/07, by v.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/06/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by v.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by Unreal.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/08/07, by v.
|