Posted by francy on 6/06/08

More | Report Post

I am a legal researcher, to be sure, but not in the classic
sense. I have spent years studying a few subjects that
impact, pretty seriously, many people everyday. Most
lawyers I have spoken to are not well versed in the details
of federally mandated drug testing. All truck drivers,
airline pilots and flight attendants and so on, must submit
to testing. The CFRs spell out very clearly the procedures
for these types of tests and commercial enterprize perform
the testing. These regulations (CFR) define the rights of
participants and explain the proceedures to implement them.
The Supreme Court has permitted such testing, however,
certain protocol must be followed. For example, the "random
selection" of employees must be scientifically
verifiable. "Choosing" instead of "random selecting" is
forbidden. If people believe they've been selected and want
to challenge the "science" of the selection method, I can't
find information anywhere that informs how to do this.
Trying to get answers from the D.O.T., I found nothing
useful. One testing giant sent me a generic one page form,
but it did not verify the science. They were offended when
I told them about this.
Does anyone share my interest in examining whether the
Constitutional provisions are protecting millions?

not heard, 6/06/08, by francy.

Family Law Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST