Re: reasonable expectations
Posted by Sir on 5/22/03
On 5/22/03, rrr wrote: > On 5/22/03, Sir wrote: >> On 5/22/03, rrr wrote: >>> There is no reasonable expectation. It depends on such >>> things as school rank, class rank, firm size, private vrs. >>> government, etc. ... and luck. >>> >>> The handful of top school, top of the class, moot court/ law >>> review types can usually go to a megafirm and pull down a >>> $100,000. For everyone else, you almost have to wonder why >>> we bothered going to law school. I've seen private firms >>> offering as low as $30,000 a year for any warm body with a >>> degree. (In my area, $32,000 is the high, but common, salary >>> for College College Graduates.) Most starting salaries will >>> range between $40-50K, in my area. Higher priced locations >>> will adjust accordingly, but you are not really getting paid >>> more, just be given an adjustment for the higher cost of >>> living. Though Government Jobs pay less, the long term >>> benefit of niche expereience, pension, medical, vacation and >>> work hours makes up for it. >>> >>> >>> On 5/21/03, B. Kimball wrote: >>>> I have just finished my second year of law school and am >>>> begining to wonder what kind of salary I can expect my >>>> first few years out of school. I cannot seem to get a bead >>>> on what a reasonable expectation is. Please assist. >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> B. Kimball >> >> Begin to think independently. Work for yourself. > > Been there, done that. I'd rather have a government job. Obviously, reasonable minds may differ. If your goal is to work for someone, the government is a good choice. However, the poster needs to be aware that you will make substantially less money because there is a salary cap in the public arena. Thats why most DAs and PDs end up in the private sector.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- reasonable expectations, 5/21/03, by B. Kimball.
- Re: reasonable expectations, 5/22/03, by rrr.
- Re: reasonable expectations, 5/22/03, by Sir.
- Re: reasonable expectations, 5/22/03, by rrr.
- Re: reasonable expectations, 5/22/03, by Sir.
|