Re: Outsourcing patents to India
Posted by Phil on 4/08/04
On 4/06/04, Barbara Rempel wrote: >>> Does this mean the beginning of the end of U.S. patent >>> prep/pros attorneys? This amazes me. When I earned my law >>> degree after getting a masters degree in engineering, I >>> thought I'd at least be safe in this field of law. Now I see >>> we are not safe anywhere. > > > This is very disconcerting. I am really concerned and would > love to know where to start in fighting this. I have a master's > in electrical engineering, currently unemployed, (by choice) to > spend a little time with husband who is pilot (great job - > cannot be outsourced). But my daughter is a graduating master's > degree candidate in Electrical Engineering at MIT. She's a > serious person who works her &^&37;$ off!! Her plan was to > safeguard her career from outsourcing by going into PATENT LAW. > If she does this, she will kill herself for another 4 or so > years, to come out with a job where she can make $30 per hour > (or way less) competing with people from India???? I know these > guys are smart. I worked with MANY of them at Intel Corp when I > was an FPGA designer. But we are not on a level playing field > with them when they can live like kings at $10k per year! I > strongly believe in capitalism, but the theories of Ayn Rand and > others did not anticipate the global climate we now have. Their > economy will not ramp up to ours to "equalize" the supply/demand > equation because there is not a decade long ramp up period. > Just come to USA, gain skills over a year or two period, go back > home and electronically transfer work to wherever. I don't want > to be a whiner. I want to be an activist who can productively > educate the powers to be and lobby for our home grown technical > professionals. We cannot recruit engineers and scientists (you > know how hard the preparation is for these jobs - not like a > month or two for truck drivers who might nowadays have a > brighter future. It's a travesty! Please dialogue with me. I > really do want to get something started!!! > barbararempel@yahoo.com > Thanks, >> If your daughter wants to be a patent litigator, then she is safe. There is currently a boom in patent litigation, and it doesn't look like it will slow down any time soon. Hugh awards for infringment are fanning the flames, and companies such as Acacia and Pangea are trying to copy the Lemelson paradigm and success rate-- applying overly broad patent claims (the patents in most cases they bought from individual inventors) to existing businesses/products/processes. Most of these patent holding companies try to extort money from many businesses by offering "reasonable" license rates (usually below a nuisance value) that they know most companies will pay to avoid the high cost of infringement. But sometimes several companies in an industry join together to fight the patents and hire patent litigators. These types of jobs cannot be outsourced to India or anywhere else. As for patent prosecution, the only somewhat plausable defense is that the Indian contract workers cannot actually represent anyone before the US Patent & Trademark Office, so someone in the US has to at least review the drafts and then file them. Of course, these people can be patent agents who make considerably less money than patent attorneys. Thus, it seems that certain tasks that a patent attorney used to perform like drafting patent applications, will go by the wayside. However, who will respond to the Office Actions? Patent agents can represent applicants and handle such matters, but by and large they do not know the law and do not know how to make strong arguments that are backed up by court decisions. Some companies that use Indian help to draft applications may also find out eventually that although those people can write a fairly good detailed description of the invention, they do not know how to draft claims, which are the heart of the application and define the invention. Good luck asserting an "important" patent that allegedly protects your most important product line if it contains badly crafted, very restrictive, claims. Thus, I think there still will be many roles that a competent patent prosecution attorney can play. But it still would be helpful, at least in the short run, if a patent prosecutor has licensing, due diligence, product clearance, opinion letter drafting and other transactional experience to fall back on, at least for the short term.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Outsourcing patents to India, 4/01/04, by RSU.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/01/04, by rsu.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/01/04, by Kibitzer.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/02/04, by bemaha.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/02/04, by Kibitzer.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/02/04, by bemaha.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/02/04, by Kibitzer.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/02/04, by rsu.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/06/04, by Barbara Rempel.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/06/04, by Barbara Rempel.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/08/04, by Phil.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/23/04, by amol.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 4/23/04, by baaba.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 5/19/04, by Shalom.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 5/19/04, by Shalom Wertsberger.
- Re: Outsourcing patents to India, 5/22/04, by Kibitzer.
|