Re: ABA v non-ABA law degree

More | Report Post

On 7/09/04, possibly perpetual patent agent wrote:
> On 7/09/04, cc wrote:
>> I have a BEE, MSEE and JD (Tier 2) with USPTO registration
>> and state bar. I have been looking for entry level work for
>> over a year with no success. Unlike engineering, the law is
>> EXTREMELY FLOODED with an OVERSUPPLY of highly qualified
>> candidates so law firms like to place games with pedigree,
>> class rank, etc. Most firms are cherry picking from top
25&37;
>> grads from top 10 law schools. A non-ABA JD is a BIG black
>> mark on your record, but if you have some experience as a
>> patent agent there may be some hope for you.
>>
>> Where did you work as a patent agent? Your best bet is to
>> seek patent attorney opportunities with a firm that you have
>> worked with in the past.
>
> I think you are right.
>
> I have 4 years of experience as a patent agent in both industry
> and law firms (chemistry/pharmaceutical). I have a doctorate
in
> Cell Biology. I am getting lots of interviews for patent agent
> positions because of my experience.
>
> Like you say, there is a real stigma about having a degree from
> a non-ABA school. In other words when viewed from my present
> credentials I am highly competetive. However, with a non-ABA
JD
> I am viewed as non-competetive in the light of all the first
> tier law school graduates. So I do not bring it up.
Especially
> since I get such a negative reaction from putative employers.
> Frankly, it actually does negate my excellant credentials as an
> agent.
>
> Quite honestly, I believe that my non-ABA law school provides a
> fine education (but what do I know). However, it is too much
> work if it doesnt get one to one's career goal. Very
depressing.
>
> You seem to be correct in your analysis and I very much
> appreciate your response.