|
|

Re: Washington state bar(IM Back for a post)
Posted by -- on 2/09/08
On 2/09/08, LD wrote: > Gentlemen, Hope all is well. I wanted to give you all some > news. I couldnt leave you with false info as I have always told > you I only give REAL Info. I called the Washington state bar > and apoke to Mary the director-check for yourselves- on if the > rule changed about DL students passing any bar, then being able > to sit for wash state bar, why on ncbex.org site is it not > changed. > THE washington supreme court rules that for only CALIFORNIA DL > STudents who pass the CA BAR, can now immediately sit for the > washington state bar. NO WAITING PERIOD--Sit IMMEDIATELY ONCE > YOU PASS THE CA BAR- But only CA. I don't know who "Mary" is but she is not the director of the Washington State Bar Assn. or even on the board of directors. You may be referring to Mary Barnes who is a "Staff Liaison." In any event "Mary's" opinion conflicts with a reading of the applicable law. Here is where "Mary" and you appear to have gone astray in your zeal to find a loophole. The APR 3 Washington State Bar Application [http://www.wsba.org/lawyers/licensing/apr3.doc] defines two types of applicants. (not including the "repeat applicant" type) 1. Student/General applicants are subject to qualifications under (i) listed at the end of this post. 2. Attorney applicants are subject to qualification under (iii) also in the list at the end of this post. As a member of the CA bar with no active practice you are subject to the student/general applicant requirements under II below. This means ABA graduation. Sorry -- no free pass for DL graduates. For DL graduates the only way to sit for the bar is the 3 year Attorney qualification under (iii). Read II below to understand that as a non-practicing attorney who was licensed less than 6 months ago you are classified as a General applicant which sec.I defines to be the same as a Student applicant. ****************************************************************** [taken from: APR 3 APPLICATION For the Washington State Bar Association Bar Examination] General Applicants: I. Applicants who have never been admitted to the practice of law in any state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, or in any jurisdiction in which the Common Law of England is the basis of its jurisprudence, are considered Student or General Applicants. II. Applicants who have been admitted to a qualifying bar within six (6) months previous to the Washington Bar exam for which they are applying, and who have never practiced law, may be considered as a General Applicant. Filing under these conditions requires the submission of a) a written affidavit confirming the applicant has never practiced law, and b) two (2) certificates of good standing (one for each application form) at least one of which must be an original. For PDF of application form, see: [http://www.wsba.org/lawyers/licensing/apr3.doc] ****************************************************************** If you are licensed to practice in another jurisdiction and do not meet the qualifications of II above you are an Attorney applicant and fall under (iii) below. As such, you may qualify to take the examination if you have 3 years of active practice which does not require ABA graduation or you may apply under (i) as an ABA graduate. The qualifications to take the bar examination are stated in APR 3 which requires the applicant to be of good moral character and to present satisfactory proof of: (i) graduation from an ABA approved law school; OR (ii) completion of the APR 6 law clerk program; OR (iii) admission to the practice of law by examination, together with current good standing, in any state or territory of the U.S. or in Washington, D.C., or any jurisdiction where the common law of England is the basis of its jurisprudence, and active legal experience for at least 3 of the 5 years immediately preceding the filing of the application. As a general applicant you are subject to (i). As an Attorney applicant you are subject to (iii). This is the current law of Washington State. A phone call to someone named "Mary" does not overcome the law. I don't believe you or "Mary" are lying -- you are simply mistaken in reading the actual requirements. Understandable because neither you nor "Mary" are licensed attorneys.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/12/08, by Lisa.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by Mediator - Tax Man.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by Lisa.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by LD.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by Lisa.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by Mediator .
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by Mediator-Tax Man.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/13/08, by --.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/16/08, by Twallstbroker.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/23/08, by Lisa.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/23/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/23/08, by Lisa.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/23/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/23/08, by Crown Prince.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/23/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/24/08, by Crown Prince.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/24/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/24/08, by --.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by P.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by Greg.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by ForrestGump.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by Crown Prince.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/25/08, by --.
- Re: Georgia bar exam , other State and Feredal bar exams, 1/26/08, by Revenue Generating Plan!.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/27/08, by Forrest Gump.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/27/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/28/08, by Forrest Gump.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/29/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/29/08, by Forrest Gump.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/29/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/30/08, by Forrest Gump.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/30/08, by steve.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/30/08, by --.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/31/08, by Forrest Gump.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 1/31/08, by --.
- Re: Washington state bar(IM Back for a post), 2/09/08, by LD.
- Re: Washington state bar(IM Back for a post), 2/09/08, by --.
- Re: Washington state bar(IM Back for a post), 2/09/08, by --.
- Re: Washington state bar(IM Back for a post), 2/10/08, by Not_A_Moron.
- Re: Washington state bar(LD is a forger!), 2/10/08, by --.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?", 2/11/08, by --.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - School of Law?, 2/11/08, by Thinking About ALU ???.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - School of Law?, 2/11/08, by Formerly A Real Law Student.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - School of Law?, 2/12/08, by ALU - No Way Jose!!!!.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - Taft is cheaper, 2/12/08, by Linda.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - Taft is cheaper, 2/12/08, by ALU not an American School? .
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 2/12/08, by Bigger Badder Better.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 2/12/08, by --.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - Taft is cheaper, 2/13/08, by Linda.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 2/13/08, by Mediatorsc.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 2/19/08, by kmarie.
- Re: RE: DC Bar and Novus, 2/23/08, by Michael .
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 2/24/08, by Phil.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 2/24/08, by --.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 3/18/08, by John Martin.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 4/08/08, by Travis.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 4/09/08, by Silly Willy.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 4/19/08, by Karole.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 4/19/08, by Karole.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 4/19/08, by Karole.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 4/19/08, by Lisa.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 5/16/08, by Ms. Enlightened.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 5/19/08, by U_R_Misenlightened.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 5/27/08, by Ed.
- Re: DC Bar, Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 6/03/08, by WrongAgainEd.
- Re: Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 6/04/08, by DP.
- Re: Novus & Breyer State University Law School, 6/04/08, by WrongAgainEd.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - Taft is cheaper, 7/15/08, by Celeste.
- Re: Abraham Lincoln University - Taft is cheaper, 7/15/08, by Linda.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 8/08/08, by loomis.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 8/09/08, by --.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 9/07/08, by yoel.
- Re: Has LD committed the tort of Defamation or "false light?, 9/07/08, by another law dream shattered.
|