Follow us!

    Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU

    Posted by Thomas on 1/24/09

    I was a student at ALU in 2003-04. They had applied to DETC by that
    date but for reasons they never explained they withdrew their
    application.

    Thomas

    On 1/24/09, Jack wrote:
    > Concord was accredited before it had anyone take the bar exam. They
    > had a 60&37; pass rate the first time any graduates took the exam.
    The
    > ALU first time pass rate is less than half that.
    >
    > I wonder why ALU has waited so long to apply to DETC? Concord and
    > Taft have been accredited for over five years.
    >
    > Jack
    >
    > On 1/22/09, DETC will make decisions by JUNE 2009 wrote:
    >> In terms of bar pass rates ALU is about where
    >> Concord was then it got DETC accredited.
    >>
    >> My prediction is ALU becomes accredited
    >> and Calif Southern Univeristy, also, not
    >> because they have a good law program but
    >> their other degree programs are solid and thus
    >> overall the school will accreditation. Also their parent
    >> company owns a regional accredited univerisity
    >> in Arizona, NorthCentral University and so this other school has
    >> helped Cal Southern prepare for accreditation.
    >>
    >> On 1/22/09, Henry wrote:
    >>> In looking at the DETC website, it looks like very few
    >>> applicants become accredited. A rough calculation looks like
    >>> less than a third.
    >>>
    >>> Henry
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 1/22/09, David wrote:
    >>>> If you take the time to read the previous post you will see
    >>>> that it does not claim that ALU was denied accreditation. It
    >>>> says pretty much the same thing that you write. (And the
    >>>> quote is accurate.)
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 1/22/09, That email was NOT from DETC official wrote:
    >>>>> Dumie,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ALU has NOT been denied accrediation and
    >>>>> anyone posting here saying that is wrong.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> We wont know for several more months, at
    >>>>> the lastest it is a June 2009 notification
    >>>>> on their website.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 1/22/09, David wrote:
    >>>>>> I received the following e-mail this morning from DETC's
    >>>>>> Director of Accreditation regarding Lincoln...
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> "The statement that DETC would guarantee accreditation to
    >>>>>> any applicant is ludicrous in the extreme. Where do people
    >>>>>> come up with these claims? Besides, the use of the
    >>>>>> word “guarantee” is verboten in the DETC Business
    >>>>>> Standards."
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> This does not mean that ALU will not be accredited at some
    >>>>>> point in time in the future. It just means that the
    >>>>>> persons or persons writing on this board that "its a done
    >>>>>> deal" or its "guaranteed" are not providing accurate
    >>>>>> information.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/22/09, by David.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/22/09, by That email was NOT from DETC official.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/22/09, by David.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/22/09, by Henry.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/22/09, by DETC will make decisions by JUNE 2009.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/24/09, by Jack.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 1/24/09, by Thomas.
  • Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU, 3/28/17, by Luvenia Morris.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.