Re: WEST COAST LAW SCHOOL CLOSED

More | Report Post

Evidence? The Case in Chief? The burden of proof of a claim rests
with the Plaintiff or Petitioner.

You state the case for West Coast, I guess you are the hot shot
that is going to bring the case for West Coast.

I say the reason there is no appeal to California Supreme Court
is because there is NO CASE !

State your case !

On 8/05/09, David wrote:
> Gee, what a suprise...the same empty arguments with no evidence to support them. Wait, I
> get it now, since some of the words are in capitals, well that makes all the difference in
> the world. Capitalize your words and shout 'em down when they disagree and you'll win
> every time. Mr ABA genius, if thats how you practice law, I feel sorry for your clients.
>
> On 8/05/09, ABA loves laughing at mail order defenders of WCSL wrote:
>> West Coast School of Law HAS NO LEGAL STANDING
>> to appeal an order to shut down from the California
>> State Bar.....( even if he had standing if he practices
>> law like he runs a law school he will get crushed in
>> Cal Supreme Court)
>>
>> But he wont be going to court. The State Bar was right
>> to close him down and WCSL will never open again.
>>
>> There is no legal issue to be resolved. The State Bar
>> has rules for unaccredited law schools and clearly
>> West Coast didnt follow those rules.
>>
>> Get over it......mail order law degree people.....the
>> school was crap.....the "Dean" was an idiot in terms
>> of meeting State Bar rules and he was closed.
>>
>> I dont see any hot shot appellate lawyers dying to take
>> up the case of West Coast School of Law or even feel
>> sorry for the "Dean".
>>
>> No correspondence law school ever closed by the State
>> Bar has ever sucessfully appealed to the California
>> Supreme Court. ever !!!!
>>
>> WEST COAST SCHOOL OF LAW IS CLOSED FOREVER.
>>
>> On 8/05/09, David wrote:
>>> Thanks so much for proving every point in my previous posts once again. You don't
>>> know beans about standing or much of anything else for that matter, but still you post
>>> here and try to shout down anybody who has the temerity to disagree with your opionion.
>>> There are specific requirements regarding justiciability, and since West Coast met all
>>> of them, if there ever was standing for an appeal of an unjust ruling, this is it.
>>> Finally, either cite some evidence to support your view or stop clogging up this board
>>> with your blather.
>>>
>>> On 8/05/09, ABA graduate not a wannabe lawyer wrote:
>>>> Dear Mr. Mail Order J.D. degree holder,
>>>>
>>>> West Coast School of Law has NO LEGAL STANDING
>>>> for an appeal in the California Supreme Court
>>>> for the State Bar closing down the law school.
>>>>
>>>> Got that? There is no legal basis for an appeal.
>>>>
>>>> Secondly, if Mr. Stallings practices law like he
>>>> runs a law school, if he had a legal basis, which
>>>> he does NOT, he would get his butt
>>>> handed to him in Court.
>>>>
>>>> West Coast School of Law is closed FOREVER !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/05/09, David wrote:
>>>>> I can assure you that he was in the process of preparing the appeal when he
>>>>> suffered the stroke from which he is still recovering. It is hardly reasonable to
>>>>> expect a man to litigate such a matter when in rehab for recovery now is it? As
>>>>> for standing, if he didnt have standing then who did? You amaze me, not only by
>>>>> your lack of empathy for this man but also by your lack of knowledge on such a
>>>>> wide range of subjects. Enough.....as far as burgers and fries go, when you take
>>>>> my order at the drive through try and get it right this time?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/05/09, ABA is the way to go ! wrote:
>>>>>> Well Mr. J.D. degree from a correspondence law school,
>>>>>> Mr. Stallings had a right to appeal the State Bar
>>>>>> decision and in fact, if the State Bar violated
>>>>>> due process rights, Mr. Stallings could file an
>>>>>> appeal with the Cal Supreme Court...I dont see
>>>>>> that appeal no where......oh.....and if he files
>>>>>> within the alloted time that appeal will be crushed
>>>>>> quickly, he has NO STANDING !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now go make those burgers and fries !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/05/09, David wrote:
>>>>>>> Do everybody on this board a favor and get some idea of what youre talking
>>>>>>> about before you make any more posts on this issue. You make no points worthy
>>>>>>> of responding to. Where my JD is from is no concern of yours. If you even
>>>>>>> bothered to look at the transcript of the hearing before the Bar, you would
>>>>>>> know that West Coast was not given a fair opportunity to comply, since the
>>>>>>> normally allowed extension for that purpose was denied in this case.
>>>>>>> Stallings made a ggod faith effort to comply, but that is obviously as
>>>>>>> thankless a task as trying to argue with someone like you. Blather on as you
>>>>>>> will, I have neither the time or the energy to continue this since you raise
>>>>>>> no points worthy of response.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/05/09, ABA all the way wrote:
>>>>>>>> Be that as it may,so you have
>>>>>>>> a JD from West Coast or Saratoga or whatever;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The owner of West Coast School of Law
>>>>>>>> did not know how to run a law school
>>>>>>>> in compliance with State Bar rules,
>>>>>>>> and he was admitted to the State Bar,
>>>>>>>> no excuse for not knowing the rules.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GOODBYE WEST COAST SCHOOL OF LAW.......ADIOS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/05/09, David wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What facts? The only thing the poster presented was his/her own unfounded
>>>>>>>>> opionion. I, on the other hand, know the man personally and speak from
>>>>>>>>> both fact and first hand knowledge. As far as your "hopes" go, wrong on
>>>>>>>>> all three counts. I already have my JD, and I am a veteran of several
>>>>>>>>> years experience to the legal profession. People far more knowledgeable
>>>>>>>>> than you will judge the merit of my service.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/05/09, Closing West Coast was a celebration by ABA grads wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> When you cant argue the facts, you personnaly
>>>>>>>>>> attack the poster.....I hope you never get in law school,
>>>>>>>>>> never graduate, and never pass the bar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You sir, would be a discredit to the legal profession.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/05/09, Dave wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I assume nothing, you prove your own lack of knowledge with every post
>>>>>>>>>>> you make. So, go ahead and run your mouth about things you know
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing about. As the wise man said, it is better to be silent and be
>>>>>>>>>>> thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. Dave Stallings was
>>>>>>>>>>> a better man on his worst day than you could ever hope to be.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/04/09, ABA all the way wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You just assumed, I know nothing, yet
>>>>>>>>>>>> I graduated from a ABA law school
>>>>>>>>>>>> and unlike you, was not disappointed
>>>>>>>>>>>> when a crap law school was closed
>>>>>>>>>>>> down by the State Bar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What a loser you are !
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/04/09, David wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spoken by a person who knows nothing, understands even less, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expresses those facts with posts such as these. The only thing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closing correspondence law schools will ensure is that only a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> select few who can afford ABA type tuitions will be able to gain a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JD and anyone else will just be closed out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/04/09, Bar did right thing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am sure he is a nice fella.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But WCSL was a joke of a law school and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it did not follow the same rules other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law schools apparently have been following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully for years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not personal, but crappy law schools
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must be closed to protect the integrity of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Juris Doctor degree. Case Closed !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/04/09, David wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Stallings provided a service to a number of students who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have gone on into the Cal Bar and are now practicing attorneys.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That the state bar chose to close the school in my view did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more of a disservice to the students who were currently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enrolled than anything else, particularly in view of the fact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Dean Stallings had a stroke and is at this writing still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in rehab and not able to do much to help the people victimized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by this act. The man was guilty of nothing more than asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Bar to clarify some of their vague communications to him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, how wss the man supposed to comply with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regulations when the Bar consistently refused to define for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him what the areas were and what needed to be done? The lack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of empathy expressed on this board for this man is nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short of appalling. "Park his car in the garage?" Lady if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is any justice in the world Dave will be one day able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive a car again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/09, Peggy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, on the good side, with the school closing the Dean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can start parking his car in the garage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peggy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/09, LAW wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the school has been shut down...