Re: In dire need of help

More | Report Post

On 9/06/02, Brian wrote:
> On 9/05/02, Should I Sue wrote:
>> I had a vehicle i had bought through a previous employer.
>> We had a contract, that stated nothing about the vehicle on
>> it. It said that i had borrowd 3400 dollars and would
>> continue to pay on it until it was payed off. Or incase of
>> termintaion the hole amount would be due.... I was layed
>> off and they said that they would take the vehicle back,
>> cause i did not have the hole amount of money.. Well we
>> made a verbal agreement for me to continue to pay on it..
>> Well I got about a month behind, and they repoed it and
>> sold it, before i could get the money to them....The one
>> thing that gets me is that the vechicle was actually in my
>> mothers name. Is there anything i can do,should i sue, or
>> should my mom sue or does anyone have any advice..?..
> Verbal agreements most likely will not stand up in court.
> Consult an attorney...most offer a free first consutation.
Sue, you blew it 2 times. Borrowing money to buy a car thats
not in your name. Two different issues here if I have the deal
right. You owe someone 3400.00.(nothing about car on loan?)
Your Mom's car was repoed.( who was listed as Leinholder) Also,
how do they repo a car with no CONTRACT using the car as
security interest? How can they be listed as leinholder on the
title if they have no contract with that car as collateral??
In most states a repo order requires a copy of the contract. I
wouldnt pickup a unit if I wasnt 99.9% sure they had a contract.
Good Luck and God Bless You roosta

Re: In dire need of help , 9/08/02, by roosta.

Legal Research Systems Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST