Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited
Posted by CP (Nicholas Webb) on 10/25/07
This is EXACTLY one of the reasons that I decided to withdraw from Southwestern after the first month. Instead of attacking the issues, you have decided to attack me. I am a real person. What I am living through is real. And yes, I did get a 162 and a 3.75 GPA (and a 3.5 at the University of Oklahoma while I was on active duty in the military getting my M.P.A. with an emphasis in public policy). I am not angry at anyone. I just am an advocate of distance learning law schools. They have less bureaucracy, less arrogance, and are just better suited to individual needs. I listen to Harvard lecturers every day. Yeah, I had some medical problems that lended to my failing the baby bar the first time (but not by much, though still a failure), but so did a whopping 80% of my peers. I don't lean on my medical problems as a crutch. I was simply using them as an example of how people with more serious medical problems might benefit from a DL law school education. The fact of the matter is this: you didn't stick to the issues, you lost the argument, and you still are bitter than you incorrectly read the statute. Twice. Did they teach you that in your legal research class at your ABA approved law school? My guess is that you actually go to a third tier law school. I'd be willing to bet. Why don't you tell everyone who you are, or are you afraid to...? As for my three or four jobs, I have only one full time job: defrauding idiots. CP You wrote: > You Sir are an angry young man who needs to compensate for his > failures by creating a fantasy world that you defend like fool. > You can do that on the Internet but not in a real law school > which is why you’re not in a real school. (despite your 162 LSAT > and 3.75 GPA; heh, heh sure I believe you) I understand that > your Tourette Syndrome puts you at a disadvantage, your episodes > are forgivable especially since you have three or four full time > jobs, a heavy calendar of cases in tax court or wherever it is > you can practice without a license, plus you have a full time > law school schedule and have to make a dozen or so vehement > posts on this board a week. Hey guy---You’re a joke. Don’t > you realize that?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Non Accredited vs Accredited, 8/14/07, by LP.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/22/07, by D McCaig.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/22/07, by CP.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/22/07, by love a good joke.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/25/07, by CP (Nicholas Webb).
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/25/07, by love a good joke (and you are).
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/27/07, by CP.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/27/07, by -.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/28/07, by CP.
- Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 3/11/09, by Nikki.
|