Follow us!

    Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited

    Posted by - on 10/27/07

    On 10/27/07, CP wrote:
    > Are you going to address the fact that you misread the statute, or are
    > you going to continue to attack me personally. Where do you go to
    > school? Are you willing to reveal yourself, or hide behind your
    > unscrupulous attacks?
    >
    > CP
    >

    Hey genius, I read the rules when you posted them in response to another
    person you were arguing with. I said you were correct that the dean
    need not be an ABA graduate--in fact according to the rules only one
    part-time administrator need be an ABA grad. I then commented that a CA
    Internet law school could be run by a single "paper administrator" and a
    faculty of fast food workers according to the letter of the rule you
    cited.

    You argue with and denigrate everyone on this board. Anyone who even
    mildly disagrees with you becomes your target. So buddy, suck up some
    of your on sh#$. You come to this board to get into arguments --
    obviously you get some kind of satisfaction in playing a tough guy on a
    keyboard.

    You wouldn't last a month in any real brick & mortar law school because
    your classmates would not take your sh#$ that long before they made you
    the honored guest at a "blanket party".

    I have no doubt that you will find pleasure in this post as it will
    allow you to puff yourself up, jump around, and flame up like a wild
    fire. I looked back at some of your previous posts and 90% of them are
    vehement, flaming diatribes attacking other people who don't totally
    agree with you. The other 10% consist of more information than anyone
    wants to know about you personally.

    My vote is that you either make civilized contributions to this board
    and stop your incessant argumentative postings or go somewhere else to
    get your kicks. I also suggest that you spend more time studying for
    the baby bar and less time telling us what idiots we are and how
    brilliant you are. Maybe you won't flunk it next time Mr. Genius.


    > On 10/25/07, love a good joke (and you are) wrote:
    >> On 10/25/07, CP (Nicholas Webb) wrote:
    >>
    >>>Yeah, I had some medical problems that lended to my failing the
    >>>baby bar the first time (but not by much, though still a failure),
    >>>but so did a whopping 80&37; of my peers.
    >>
    >> Love it--keep those jokes coming--you are a riot--funnier than a
    >> rubber crutch--80 per cent failure rate? sounds like you are in good
    >> company--tell us more about the quality of the website you call a
    >> school.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Non Accredited vs Accredited, 8/14/07, by LP.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/22/07, by D McCaig.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/22/07, by CP.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/22/07, by love a good joke.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/25/07, by CP (Nicholas Webb).
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/25/07, by love a good joke (and you are).
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/27/07, by CP.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/27/07, by -.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 10/28/07, by CP.
  • Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited, 3/11/09, by Nikki.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.