Re: Non Accredited vs Accredited

More | Report Post

Your post really doesn't merit a response. Attack the issues and stop
attacking me personally. Sounds to me like you have a self-confidence
problem and are trying to distract from your own flaws.

You need a girlfriend. And some medicine.

CP

On 10/27/07, - wrote:
> On 10/27/07, CP wrote:
>> Are you going to address the fact that you misread the statute, or are
>> you going to continue to attack me personally. Where do you go to
>> school? Are you willing to reveal yourself, or hide behind your
>> unscrupulous attacks?
>>
>> CP
>>
>
> Hey genius, I read the rules when you posted them in response to another
> person you were arguing with. I said you were correct that the dean
> need not be an ABA graduate--in fact according to the rules only one
> part-time administrator need be an ABA grad. I then commented that a CA
> Internet law school could be run by a single "paper administrator" and a
> faculty of fast food workers according to the letter of the rule you
> cited.
>
> You argue with and denigrate everyone on this board. Anyone who even
> mildly disagrees with you becomes your target. So buddy, suck up some
> of your on sh#$. You come to this board to get into arguments --
> obviously you get some kind of satisfaction in playing a tough guy on a
> keyboard.
>
> You wouldn't last a month in any real brick & mortar law school because
> your classmates would not take your sh#$ that long before they made you
> the honored guest at a "blanket party".
>
> I have no doubt that you will find pleasure in this post as it will
> allow you to puff yourself up, jump around, and flame up like a wild
> fire. I looked back at some of your previous posts and 90&37; of them
are
> vehement, flaming diatribes attacking other people who don't totally
> agree with you. The other 10&37; consist of more information than anyone
> wants to know about you personally.
>
> My vote is that you either make civilized contributions to this board
> and stop your incessant argumentative postings or go somewhere else to
> get your kicks. I also suggest that you spend more time studying for
> the baby bar and less time telling us what idiots we are and how
> brilliant you are. Maybe you won't flunk it next time Mr. Genius.
>
>
>
>
>> On 10/25/07, love a good joke (and you are) wrote:
>>> On 10/25/07, CP (Nicholas Webb) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yeah, I had some medical problems that lended to my failing the
>>>>baby bar the first time (but not by much, though still a failure),
>>>>but so did a whopping 80&37; of my peers.
>>>
>>> Love it--keep those jokes coming--you are a riot--funnier than a
>>> rubber crutch--80 per cent failure rate? sounds like you are in good
>>> company--tell us more about the quality of the website you call a
>>> school.