Re: blog privacy
Posted by -- on 3/08/08
On 3/08/08, caged312 wrote: > I understand the right to work law. > > At the present time they have suspended this person stating > reason as slander. > > Im sure if push comes to shove they will use the right to work > to fire if that's what they choose. > > If the person who printed and made public the blog is not an > invited person but the parent of one that is a minor, is that > still considered illegal access and would it be admissable? You may have a privacy action against the person who invaded your privacy but once it is public information, the company will most likely be allowed to introduce it into evidence. If the company files suit for slander the evidence will also likely be admissible. If the company shows you slandered them to a third party, even if you intended it to be a private conversation, you will probably lose the suit.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- blog privacy, 3/07/08, by caged312.
- Re: blog privacy, 3/07/08, by --.
- Re: blog privacy, 3/08/08, by caged312.
- Re: blog privacy, 3/08/08, by --.
|