Re: Judge frauded signature of Petitioner:DD

More | Report Post

Just checking in....does the heart good to see someone, especially pro se,
prevailing.

DD

On 7/06/05, DD wrote:
> Oh my goodness,I think the questions that would make one go postal on here
> are the continuos "how do I get out of the house at 17" and the "dead beat
> dads trying to get of paying child support".
>
> My question was touched on by a few respondents when orginally submitted, I
> was supposed to keep updates yet I have not re-asked the question. It is
> still pending in the courts.
>
> Update however is I continue to stay ahead of the "GAME" played in the
> court room.
>
> A visting judge who supposidly sat on the Appeals Court for 9 years even
> screwed up along with the county atty. His comments on record were "just
> pay the court cost make peace with Judge Stovall so you can get your other
> motions heard" with that and further mistakes once again not following
> procedures cost them the win on my motion for free appeal. My point in the
> case is why should I have to pay to have documents corrected when the Judge
> and her staff created the problem in the first place?
>
> Along with that, the original Judge has been recused and they have had to
> call in a Judge on special assignment to hear any motions while case is
> pending appeal.
>
> This judge is one that is dotting every I and crossing every T, doesn't
> want her but in a crack and is not giving the Respondent any room for
> excuses. She actually followed the law and issued capias for non-appearance
> of Respondent and witness regarding hearing for enforcement pending appeal.
>
> I was simply floored that she actually did her job didn't bat an eye or try
> to brush me aside because I am pro-se. Of course we agree on one thing it
> would be much easier if I could pay for an attorney, but that is out of the
> question, can't afford it. Legal Aid won't touch it because "it's not
> their appeal".
>
> The funniest thing though, during the capias/show cause hearing, the
> Respondent says to the judge "Your Honor, my wife hasn't signed the final
> decree can you get her to sign it today". Oh my god, the respondent just
> proved my case by his verbal statement alone that I didn't sign the very
> decree I am appealing based on first and formost my Frauded/Forged
> signature. I am still laughing over that, as it will be probably the only
> true nail in the coffin I need submitt to win my appeal.
>
> The Court Reporter received a letter with notice to respond to motion
> notice of original appeal, as she was a month over due on submitting
> records and had made no effort to request extension. When she called me
> she said " I thought it had all been settled" and did she still need to
> send the records after having received the notice from the Appeals
> Court. DUH!!! can she read English? The Appeals Court is telling
> her "SEND THE RECORDS".
>
> Furthermore, the investigation with the Judicial Conduct Commission is
> still on going with regard to Judicial misconduct and fraud by an officer
> of the court.
>
> Again, advise and opionions are appreciated... have a great week!
>
> DD
>
> On 7/06/05, dd wrote:
>> Hey v,
>> Speaking of postal......sometimes I just really, really understand.
>>
>> On 5/05/05, v wrote:
>>> To all the letter carriers,
>>> somone could go postal. Yes this
>>> was asked a few weks ago on the
>>> legal questions chat board. I
>>> believe it was answerd. Why is it
>>> repeating it self? Hi! little
>>> dd.! i did not recognize you offf
>>> the tox board. I'm traveling light
>>> i only carry one letter with me.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/04/05, 00 wrote:
>>>> The poster's question was
>>> answered some weeks back on
>>> another thread
>>>> on a different board on here.
>>> They had posted multiple times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/04/05, Who Cares wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear dd's,ee's,ff's,gg's,oo's
>>>>>
>>>>> Who CARES if you are dd,DD,OO,GG
>>>>>
>>>>> This person has a serious
>>> concern, question, situation. So
>>> stop
>>>>> being brainless with dd, DD,
>>> oo,GG. Who cares.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/03/05, DD wrote:
>>>>>> unless you have identified
>>> yourself I suppose the confusion
>>> would
>>>>>> come if we ask the same exact
>>> question somehow and they thought
>>>>>> we were repeating ourselves.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/03/05, 00 wrote:
>>>>>>> And of course, neither one of
>>> you should be confused with me--
>>>>>>> 00.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/03/05, dd wrote:
>>>>>>>> DD,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just want to make sure that
>>> regular posters on the board
>>>>>>>> don't confuse you with me.
>>> I post primarily on toxboard but
>>>>>>>> some of those who cruise the
>>> entire selection may confuse
>>>>>>>> your initials w/ mine.
>>>>>>>> dd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/24/05, DD wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I am a victim of Fraud and
>>> Forgery committed by a District
>>>>>>>>> Court Judge. Have been told
>>> by some that this Judge using a
>>>>>>>>> page that contained my
>>> signature from a previous document
>>>>>>>>> to finalize a new document
>>> she prepared and signed should
>>>>>>>>> just be overlooked because
>>> after all I have several things
>>>>>>>>> in my favor in the final
>>> order. Now I ask you in the future
>>>>>>>>> who will be acused of fraud
>>> if I don't dispute the use of
>>>>>>>>> my signature? Of course it
>>> will be me because I neither
>>>>>>>>> prepared, agreed to or
>>> signed the document that she ruled
>>>>>>>>> on. I can't even express
>>> the agrivation I feel about this
>>>>>>>>> situation. The fact that my
>>> signature is forged makes the
>>>>>>>>> entire judgment void and I
>>> have to start with square one,
>>>>>>>>> of course the District
>>> Judge isn't admitting to anything
>>>>>>>>> being wrong so I now in the
>>> Appeals Court seeking relief.
>>>>>>>>> Having to stay married to
>>> an abuser and dead beat dad
>>>>>>>>> because the Court committed
>>> a crime is just beyond words.
>>>>>>>>> Should I file criminal
>>> charges as well as mental and
>>>>>>>>> emotional anquish caused by
>>> this Judges wrong doing?