Re: US mail tampering
Posted by M'sta Mikey on 10/11/06
On 10/11/06, pat wrote: > > I guess my question was unclear--thank you for responding. The > envelopes have my name on them. It is obvious from the return > address and the identity of the sender that this mail is personal > mail. I have filled out change of address forms, but that has not > resolved the problem. what I am seeking are legal citations which > would either support or refute the position asserted by the postal > inspector employee I spoke with, which is the moment the mail is > delivered to my former employer, it becomes their property and they > can do whatever they want with it. My former employer is not my > agent and the mail in question is patently not connected with their > business. By the way, my former employer is the federal government. Pat, the postal inspector is correct; if it arrives at your former employer's address, it's their property. Go to the post office and inquire as to why your mail is still being delivered to their address and request, in person, that it be changed.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- US mail tampering, 11/03/05, by Jason.
- Re: US mail tampering, 11/04/05, by G. venkatachalam.
- Re: US mail tampering, 11/22/05, by Sean.
- Re: US mail tampering, 7/09/06, by Falcon.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/10/06, by MG.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/10/06, by pat.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/11/06, by v.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/11/06, by pat.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/11/06, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/16/06, by pat.
- Re: US mail tampering, 12/08/06, by Anne Nelson.
- Re: US mail tampering, 1/14/07, by stephaniee.
- Re: US mail tampering, 1/20/07, by Jory.
- Re: US mail tampering, 3/01/07, by Kent.
- Re: US mail tampering, 3/21/07, by Nickie.
- Re: US mail tampering, 3/22/07, by Elonza Hart.
- Re: US mail tampering, 7/06/09, by Cindy.
- Re: US mail tampering, 7/06/09, by Cindy.
|