ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Products Liability Chatboard

Hot Now...
Attorney Chat Center
Attorney Classifieds
Attorney Chatboards
Practice Areas
Law Students
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Classified Ads

Re: Charlene Blake Is Certifiably Nuts!!
Posted by Roger Miller on 5/06/07

    NO Charlene, I'm not Pro Corporate as you seem to think, and which you have tried
    desperately to convince others.
    DEFINITELY NOT, and it's incorrect for you to assume so.
    I am in fact, pro truth, pro honesty, pro integrity, and totally against lying,
    manipulating, misrepresenting, and generally opposed to those like you who seem to
    have have no conscience whatsoever when it comes to saying whatever it takes,
    right or wrong, to support your case.
    In other words, I speak out at YOU, and the misdirected crusade you seem possessed
    with.
    Your statements cannot stand up to close examination under any circumstances, yet
    you carry on like you were quoting the bible!!
    You show all the signs of someone who possesses an inherent inability to realize
    that you are completely wrong!!
    It may come as a surprise to you, but it's quite obvious you are not really
    winning the hearts and minds of anyone, because most, if not all, of those who
    followed your hopeless cause have lost faith.
    And you have no one to blame but yourself!!

    On 5/04/07, Charlene Blake wrote:
    > On 5/02/07, Roger Miller wrote:
    >> One must laugh at the insanity of Charlene Blake's efforts to garner attention
    >> to these bizzare claims of malfeasance by automakers.
    >> It clearly smacks of a neurotic obsession.
    >>
    >
    > Roger, I'd like to suggest that you might be a tad;-) (understatement!) obsessed
    > with my postings. I realize you are pro-corporate as opposed to pro-consumer.
    > So be it. You have every right to be, but you need to understand that thousands
    > of Toyota owners LOST THEIR ORIGINAL VEHICLE WARRANTIES due to premature engine
    > failure due to sludge.
    >
    > If you are unable to be empathetic to this viewpoint, I suggest that you be
    > willing to speak to just a handful of these owners to truly understand their
    > predicaments. Perhaps then you might be able to show some human compassion, to
    > understand that a failed engine is a "big deal" more than financially, to see
    the
    > true impact of the loss of the second biggest (for most) investment these owners
    > have made in their lives.
    >
    > One reason that I have garnered respect and credibility is that I don't attack
    > personally when I post. I don't see any point in this way of doing things. In
    > addition, I don't give up when I know something is right. It is right to stand
    > by the countless Toyota owners who have tried to get relief from the company
    > unsuccessfully. It is right to connect their experiences so that more
    > information about this problem is gleaned. It is right (not to mention
    > appropriate) to keep the dialogue going. The CSP does not begin to benefit all
    > the owners who have experienced premature engine failure in a Toyota. IF Toyota
    > follows through (remember NO AGENCY is monitoring this follow through), then
    only
    > some are given repair relief. Owner follow-up information reveals that the CSP
    > makes Toyota customers jump through hoops only to find out that there is a
    > loophole for the company.
    >
    > There are still too many unanswered questions in this saga. Won't you help the
    > Toyota owners uncover more, Roger?
    >
    > Charlene Blake
    > cblake@erols.com
    > Toyota Owners Online Unite for Resolution
    > http://www.petitiononline.com/TMC2003/petition.html

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.