Follow us!

    Re: spinal cord stimulator

    Posted by billy on 1/11/15

    On 8/24/13, Rovert Dutille wrote:
    > Is anybody aware that each and every patient on the spinal
    > chatboard has passed a psychological exam in order to have
    > the implant? Does that not determine then that we are of
    > sound mine. Enough so that we are fully capable of making
    > serious decisions about our healthcare? Why then are we
    > nott getting the attention this subject deserves?

    OK, Rovert. If one passes the psyche exam in order to get a
    frontal lobotomy, then are such of "sound mine"?
    You are quite correct in that this subject, especially the
    succinct subject of "contact, and/or leads disconnecting"
    constitutes a product failure. Whatever you do do not go to a
    website that uses an attorney named Loogan, Lonagan - for
    these matters. From evidence that I have seen, he is in bed
    with the Mfg. - Medtronic. A good idea will receive a
    maelstrom of feces upon, until proven to be worthy.
    I am not a lawyer, however, 10 or more common plaintiffs get
    together, and thus forms a class action suit. Bloodsuckers,
    (attorneys), will fly in like buzzards thereafter. The way a
    CAS works is best with a firm similar to Fullbright &
    Jaworski, or with an Akin, (et all) firm. However, there are
    small firms with decent records against big medical. In this
    case, Medtronic

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • spinal cord stimulator, 8/24/13, by Rovert Dutille.
  • Re: spinal cord stimulator, 1/11/15, by billy.
  • Re: spinal cord stimulator, 4/14/17, by Patricia Diane Bruyette.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.