Re: spinal cord stimulator
Posted by billy on 1/11/15
On 8/24/13, Rovert Dutille wrote: > Is anybody aware that each and every patient on the spinal > chatboard has passed a psychological exam in order to have > the implant? Does that not determine then that we are of > sound mine. Enough so that we are fully capable of making > serious decisions about our healthcare? Why then are we > nott getting the attention this subject deserves? OK, Rovert. If one passes the psyche exam in order to get a frontal lobotomy, then are such of "sound mine"? You are quite correct in that this subject, especially the succinct subject of "contact, and/or leads disconnecting" constitutes a product failure. Whatever you do do not go to a website that uses an attorney named Loogan, Lonagan - for these matters. From evidence that I have seen, he is in bed with the Mfg. - Medtronic. A good idea will receive a maelstrom of feces upon, until proven to be worthy. I am not a lawyer, however, 10 or more common plaintiffs get together, and thus forms a class action suit. Bloodsuckers, (attorneys), will fly in like buzzards thereafter. The way a CAS works is best with a firm similar to Fullbright & Jaworski, or with an Akin, (et all) firm. However, there are small firms with decent records against big medical. In this case, Medtronic
Posts on this thread, including this one
- spinal cord stimulator, 8/24/13, by Rovert Dutille.
- Re: spinal cord stimulator, 1/11/15, by billy.
- Re: spinal cord stimulator, 4/14/17, by Patricia Diane Bruyette.
|