Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law.....
Posted by Hardy Parkerson, Atty. on 5/18/06
Well stated, Zephyr! Keep up the good work! s/Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles, LA On 5/17/06, The Zephyr wrote: > Wow, what a bunch of doom-gloomers! I remember responding to one of > Carol’s posts regarding all the nay-sayers. Kudos JF for giving > realistic good advice; after all, we’re all attorneys here … right? > We all know about assumption of risk. I doubt any blog comments > would inspire hundreds of solos into running headlong, lemming like > into areas they no nothing about and proclaiming their proficiency. > As for why somebody is selling a book on how to succeed – who > cares? Maybe he likes writing more than practicing law. Me, I like > practicing law but I like fishing more … but fishing don’t pay the > bills. JF, keep the suggestions coming. Everybody must do their > own risk analysis and make their decisions. I view this forum as a > collective brain-storming session. I like seeing all the ideas > presented, and then I (yes me) figure out which will work well > within my comfort level. > Why is everybody so antagonistic on this forum; I seriously doubt if > even half the posters are actually licensed attorneys. > > ~Zephyr. > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Honorable Gentleman wrote: >> RJon, you are so successful at solo practice that you sell and >> market an internet site and ebook about it. Lol.....Me no think >> so!! Why don't you tell everybody here what happened that caused >> you to sell ebooks instead of practice law. That will be a useful >> learning tool here. >> >> On 5/17/06, RJon@HowToMakeItRain.com wrote: >>> For the record, I don't know either Mr. Nathan or "J.F." >>> >>> I have built a successful practice as a solo however, and I've >>> taught literally thousands of other lawyers how to do the same. >>> So it's from my own personal experience and the experiences of >>> many, many Rainmaker clients of mine when I say that JF is on >>> the right track. >>> >>> Mistake # 2 from my free e-book >>> href="http://wwww.howtomakeitrain.com" rel="nofollow">"Ten Rainmaking Mistakes >>> Solo Practitioners Make" is failing to package yourself and >>> your practice correctly. My most successful Rainmakers are >>> those who limit their practices and are pro-active about how >>> they package themselves for the market. Limiting your practice >>> increases the rate at which you become proficient and well-known >>> in the market. It also has the beneficial effect of positioning >>> you for referrals from all those other lawyers in different >>> practice areas. >>> >>> There are so many different ways to create a niche, even within >>> each of the practice areas JF says he limits his practice to. >>> It is impossible for me to say, without knowing more than could >>> possibly be learned in a brief blog posting, is whether or not >>> he has all the pieces fit-together properly. But what I can say >>> with complete confidence based on years of experience and much >>> success, is that what JF is saying he has accomplished is >>> perfectly realistic. In any case, the main purpose of my >>> comment was to offer an objective opinion from someone who >>> doesn't know either of the two, as I don't think anyone benefits >>> when things degenerate into schoolyard-style name-calling. >>> >>> Anyone interested in a free copy of the book can send me an e- >>> mail & I'll be glad to send it along, >>> >>> RJON ROBINS >>> HowToMakeItRain.com >>> Dedicated To Helping Lawyers In Small Law Firms Make Alot Of >>> Money. >>> On 5/17/06, JF wrote: >>>> What an uninformed individual you are. Since you attacked my >>>> personal character, honesty, motives, and competency, I have >>>> no choice but to defend what I said and what I have done. >>>> >>>> First, I am not advocating that anyone jump from one type of >>>> practice to another. If you read my posts over the last year >>>> or so, you will see that I have always advocated a limited >>>> practice, but not so much that you will go out of business if >>>> one area of law drastically changes (for example, bankruptcy >>>> law, where business slowed after the recent changes). My point >>>> was, there are ways to attract business, no matter what type >>>> of law you are practicing in, and I cited examples from my >>>> personal experiences. >>>> >>>> I am in my 12th year of practice. I do not "skate through" >>>> different areas, moving from one area to the next at the drop >>>> of a hat. I have always devoted a large portion of my time on >>>> real estate which has dominated my practice for the past five >>>> years. Before that, I also spent much of my time on >>>> bankruptcy, and wills, estates & trusts have always been part >>>> of my practice. These areas of law are not so different, and >>>> not so diverse, that one cannot practice them all at once. In >>>> fact, they largely go hand in hand; I basically have a >>>> transactional practice, although bankruptcy does involve the >>>> court. A competent real estate attorney cannot practice >>>> without being familiar with trust law, and many if not most >>>> real estate lawyers supplement there practices with some >>>> estate planning. They both involve property law concepts. I >>>> spent years practicing bankruptcy law (along with real estate) >>>> before real estate took over, simply because of the volume of >>>> real estate I was receiving. I started bankruptcy again, >>>> because real estate declined and I saw an opportunity when >>>> local lawyers were dropping bankruptcy from their practices. >>>> While I am not an expert under the new rules, I am carefully >>>> working my way through, just like everybody else. >>>> >>>> My practice has been consistent and well-grounded. "Pie in the >>>> sky" might apply if I suddenly took up divorce law, or tax >>>> law, or employment law, or something else that I have not put >>>> time and effort into learning. >>>> >>>> I do not suggest that my chosen practice areas cannot be >>>> extremely complex. But as I have posted here before, I >>>> associate myself with experts to take over matters I cannot >>>> handle. For example, zoning is a complex area of real estate >>>> which is different from town to town under their respective >>>> ordinances. I know who the zoning experts are in each of my >>>> surrounding communities who help me with local zoning issues >>>> when I have cases in their towns. I am also associated with an >>>> estate planner with an LLM degree in tax who helps me with tax >>>> and medicaid planning, when called for. In the past, on this >>>> board, I have suggested that others do the same; you would >>>> know this if you paid attention rather than jumping to >>>> conclusions about me. >>>> >>>> Regarding business law, this has not been a specialty of mine, >>>> but it is not new either, and it has gone hand in hand with my >>>> real estate practice. I have set up many LLCs for real estate >>>> and condominium developers, and I have dealt with their >>>> pertinent business issues. I am associated with a good CPA >>>> (his office is right across the street from mine) who works >>>> with me on the tax issues. I have already associated myself >>>> with an employment lawyer for employee issues, if and when the >>>> time comes, and I have someone (an old boss, as a matter of >>>> fact) who guides me on licensing issues (part of his municipal >>>> law concentration). >>>> >>>> Malpractice claims? I have had none. My bankruptcy clients >>>> receive their discharges. My real estate developers finish >>>> their projects, sell their real estate under the LLCs I >>>> create, make their money, pay me (quite well), and are >>>> shielded from personal liability. A number of my clients have >>>> passed away and my wills have withstood probate, including one >>>> that was challenged by a family member who was written out of >>>> the will. My real estate buyers re-sell their properties with >>>> no title issues, when I was the one who certified title. In >>>> fact, of the many hundreds of title insurance policies I have >>>> issued, I have yet to have a claim. >>>> >>>> I make money and stay out of trouble, because I know my >>>> capabilities and limitations. It's not hard to find other >>>> lawyers who are willing and able to work with you. In fact, >>>> it's part of the relationship-building process I advocate. >>>> This is how a solo runs a business. Someone once told me (my >>>> municipal law boss referred to above, as a matter of fact) >>>> that as a solo, you have to "bob and weave". This is what I >>>> do - I bob and weave. This does not make me "one of the most >>>> amazing lawyers in the world" (your juvenile words). It >>>> makes me one more solo who knows how to run a practice. >>>> >>>> I write posts with the hope that someone might be helped, and >>>> I read posts with the hope that I might be helped. I do not >>>> spend time here with the intent of leading someone down the >>>> wrong road. It seems that whenever I post something, someone >>>> like you attacks me. This is why I had given up on this board. >>>> I tried to come back, but right now I cannot understand why. >>>> >>>> You have accused me of either being a "pie in sky bragging of >>>> a fool who is too stupid to know what type of malpractice >>>> claims await him" or "a lawyer who is both quite skilled but >>>> also a bit of a sadistic twerp spewing this nonsense to >>>> desperate people so that he can laugh while they get >>>> themselves in over there heads". I have demonstrated that I am >>>> neither. >>>> >>>> Mr. Nathan, now that I have put you in your place, you are >>>> dismissed. Grow up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/16/06, joe nathan wrote: >>>>> I don't want to imply that you are telling lies or suggest >>>>> that you are not capable, but you're either one of the most >>>>> amazing lawyers in the world or you have a load of >>>>> malpractice claims waiting to surface. >>>>> >>>>> Business law (i guess you mean corporate - tax issues >>>>> included), will & trusts, real estate, and bankruptcy are >>>> all >>>>> unique practice areas with their own twists and turns. one >>>>> ordinarily does not float so freely from one of these >>>>> practice areas to the other without a fair number of >>>>> mistakes. in fact, even seasoned practitioners in each of >>>>> these areas make many mistakes and often serious mistakes >>>>> with malpractice consequences. perhaps you have years of >>>>> practice experience, but you may have little in the areas >>>>> that you are trying to transition to. that still makes you >>>> a >>>>> beginner. >>>>> >>>>> in the end, i really don't think you practice competently in >>>>> all of the different areas you skate through. maybe you do; >>>>> its possible. but you really should think twice about >>>>> offering this type of advice to struggling solos who will do >>>>> anything for a buck. they just might take you up on it. if >>>>> you are in fact competant in each of these areas, it must >>>>> dawn on you that there are complications that someone of >>>> less >>>>> skill than you could easily stumble over. >>>>> >>>>> anyone reading this should take this for what it is - either >>>>> the pie in sky bragging of a fool who is too stupid to know >>>>> what type of malpractice claims await him or a lawyer who is >>>>> both quite skilled but also a bit of a sadistic twerp >>>> spewing >>>>> this nonsense to desperate people so that he can laugh while >>>>> they get themselves in over there heads. on the other hand, >>>>> if you're like many solos there is nothing much for a >>>>> malpractice plaintfiff to take from you - unless of course >>>>> they would like to have the sheriff come out and seize your >>>>> student loan notes. in that case, maybe this isn't so bad. >>>>> >>>>> On 5/15/06, JF wrote: >>>>>> For better or for worse, I continue to occasionally write >>>>>> posts that may actually help those drowning solos actually >>>>>> build their practices. I have been practicing real estate >>>>>> law for a number of years, but the downturn in the real >>>>>> estate market has forced me to expand into other areas. I >>>>>> have had no problem obtaining new clients and new types of >>>>>> work, and I do this by fishing where the fish are. For >>>>>> example, in the past, I have suggested that solos hand >>>>>> out "Have You Made a Will?" brochures to their existing >>>>>> clients. A great way to get your client to come in for >>>>>> some estate planning. When the new bankruptcy law went >>>>>> into effect, many bankruptcy lawyers dropped that area of >>>>>> practice. I spent an afternoon on the phone calling these >>>>>> lawyers, telling them that I am practicing bankruptcy law, >>>>>> and now a number of them have used me as their referral >>>>>> attorney. I originally built my real estate practice by >>>>>> opening my office next door to a large, busy real estate >>>>>> broker office. The referrals came quickly and >>>>>> consistently. Again, fishing where the fish are. All this >>>>>> has been supplemented by bar lawyer referral programs. >>>>>> >>>>>> My newest marketing endeavor targets business entities, >>>>>> who (in my opinion) ultimately make the best clients. I >>>>>> had ignored business clients in the past (with the >>>>>> exception of real estate developers) largely because I did >>>>>> not believe there were many new businesses in my area, and >>>>>> existing businesses typically already have counsel. Then I >>>>>> checked the new business certificate filings in the city >>>>>> that I practice in and found that there are many new >>>>>> business filings every month. I have been active in the >>>>>> local Chamber of Commerce for over a year, and I am the >>>>>> only lawyer who gives them my time. So I simply called the >>>>>> Chamber director, who confirmed that, yes, a good amount >>>>>> of new business people call her for lawyer referrals, and >>>>>> from now on she will certainly give them my name (since >>>>>> I'm the only lawyer in town who bothers with them). I had >>>>>> my first client within a week. Granted, many of these new >>>>>> businesses will fail, but I will receive the start-up work >>>>>> and retain those that succeed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Virtually all solos know how to practice law. The hard >>>>>> part is obtaining clients, which seems to be the problem >>>>>> people have here. The work is out there; you just have to >>>>>> reach out and grab it. It's all about relationship >>>>>> building, making yourself visible in the community, and >>>>>> letting people know what you do. >>>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by JF.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by Jimmy.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by JF.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by Ronald.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by JF.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by JF.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by Ronald.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by JF.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by joe nathan.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by JF.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by RJon@HowToMakeItRain.com.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by Honorable Gentleman.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by The Zephyr.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by Carlos.
- Re: Internet Advertising, 5/17/06, by The Zephyr.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/18/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/18/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles.
- Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/18/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
|