Follow us!

    Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law.....

    Posted by Hardy Parkerson, Atty. on 5/18/06

    Well stated, Zephyr! Keep up the good work!

    s/Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles, LA

    On 5/17/06, The Zephyr wrote:
    > Wow, what a bunch of doom-gloomers! I remember responding to one of
    > Carol’s posts regarding all the nay-sayers. Kudos JF for giving
    > realistic good advice; after all, we’re all attorneys here … right?
    > We all know about assumption of risk. I doubt any blog comments
    > would inspire hundreds of solos into running headlong, lemming like
    > into areas they no nothing about and proclaiming their proficiency.
    > As for why somebody is selling a book on how to succeed – who
    > cares? Maybe he likes writing more than practicing law. Me, I like
    > practicing law but I like fishing more … but fishing don’t pay the
    > bills. JF, keep the suggestions coming. Everybody must do their
    > own risk analysis and make their decisions. I view this forum as a
    > collective brain-storming session. I like seeing all the ideas
    > presented, and then I (yes me) figure out which will work well
    > within my comfort level.
    > Why is everybody so antagonistic on this forum; I seriously doubt if
    > even half the posters are actually licensed attorneys.
    >
    > ~Zephyr.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 5/17/06, Honorable Gentleman wrote:
    >> RJon, you are so successful at solo practice that you sell and
    >> market an internet site and ebook about it. Lol.....Me no think
    >> so!! Why don't you tell everybody here what happened that caused
    >> you to sell ebooks instead of practice law. That will be a useful
    >> learning tool here.
    >>
    >> On 5/17/06, RJon@HowToMakeItRain.com wrote:
    >>> For the record, I don't know either Mr. Nathan or "J.F."
    >>>
    >>> I have built a successful practice as a solo however, and I've
    >>> taught literally thousands of other lawyers how to do the same.
    >>> So it's from my own personal experience and the experiences of
    >>> many, many Rainmaker clients of mine when I say that JF is on
    >>> the right track.
    >>>
    >>> Mistake # 2 from my free e-book >>> href="http://wwww.howtomakeitrain.com" rel="nofollow">"Ten Rainmaking Mistakes
    >>> Solo Practitioners Make"
    is failing to package yourself and
    >>> your practice correctly. My most successful Rainmakers are
    >>> those who limit their practices and are pro-active about how
    >>> they package themselves for the market. Limiting your practice
    >>> increases the rate at which you become proficient and well-known
    >>> in the market. It also has the beneficial effect of positioning
    >>> you for referrals from all those other lawyers in different
    >>> practice areas.
    >>>
    >>> There are so many different ways to create a niche, even within
    >>> each of the practice areas JF says he limits his practice to.
    >>> It is impossible for me to say, without knowing more than could
    >>> possibly be learned in a brief blog posting, is whether or not
    >>> he has all the pieces fit-together properly. But what I can say
    >>> with complete confidence based on years of experience and much
    >>> success, is that what JF is saying he has accomplished is
    >>> perfectly realistic. In any case, the main purpose of my
    >>> comment was to offer an objective opinion from someone who
    >>> doesn't know either of the two, as I don't think anyone benefits
    >>> when things degenerate into schoolyard-style name-calling.
    >>>
    >>> Anyone interested in a free copy of the book can send me an e-
    >>> mail & I'll be glad to send it along,
    >>>
    >>> RJON ROBINS
    >>> HowToMakeItRain.com
    >>> Dedicated To Helping Lawyers In Small Law Firms Make Alot Of
    >>> Money.
    >>> On 5/17/06, JF wrote:
    >>>> What an uninformed individual you are. Since you attacked my
    >>>> personal character, honesty, motives, and competency, I have
    >>>> no choice but to defend what I said and what I have done.
    >>>>
    >>>> First, I am not advocating that anyone jump from one type of
    >>>> practice to another. If you read my posts over the last year
    >>>> or so, you will see that I have always advocated a limited
    >>>> practice, but not so much that you will go out of business if
    >>>> one area of law drastically changes (for example, bankruptcy
    >>>> law, where business slowed after the recent changes). My point
    >>>> was, there are ways to attract business, no matter what type
    >>>> of law you are practicing in, and I cited examples from my
    >>>> personal experiences.
    >>>>
    >>>> I am in my 12th year of practice. I do not "skate through"
    >>>> different areas, moving from one area to the next at the drop
    >>>> of a hat. I have always devoted a large portion of my time on
    >>>> real estate which has dominated my practice for the past five
    >>>> years. Before that, I also spent much of my time on
    >>>> bankruptcy, and wills, estates & trusts have always been part
    >>>> of my practice. These areas of law are not so different, and
    >>>> not so diverse, that one cannot practice them all at once. In
    >>>> fact, they largely go hand in hand; I basically have a
    >>>> transactional practice, although bankruptcy does involve the
    >>>> court. A competent real estate attorney cannot practice
    >>>> without being familiar with trust law, and many if not most
    >>>> real estate lawyers supplement there practices with some
    >>>> estate planning. They both involve property law concepts. I
    >>>> spent years practicing bankruptcy law (along with real estate)
    >>>> before real estate took over, simply because of the volume of
    >>>> real estate I was receiving. I started bankruptcy again,
    >>>> because real estate declined and I saw an opportunity when
    >>>> local lawyers were dropping bankruptcy from their practices.
    >>>> While I am not an expert under the new rules, I am carefully
    >>>> working my way through, just like everybody else.
    >>>>
    >>>> My practice has been consistent and well-grounded. "Pie in the
    >>>> sky" might apply if I suddenly took up divorce law, or tax
    >>>> law, or employment law, or something else that I have not put
    >>>> time and effort into learning.
    >>>>
    >>>> I do not suggest that my chosen practice areas cannot be
    >>>> extremely complex. But as I have posted here before, I
    >>>> associate myself with experts to take over matters I cannot
    >>>> handle. For example, zoning is a complex area of real estate
    >>>> which is different from town to town under their respective
    >>>> ordinances. I know who the zoning experts are in each of my
    >>>> surrounding communities who help me with local zoning issues
    >>>> when I have cases in their towns. I am also associated with an
    >>>> estate planner with an LLM degree in tax who helps me with tax
    >>>> and medicaid planning, when called for. In the past, on this
    >>>> board, I have suggested that others do the same; you would
    >>>> know this if you paid attention rather than jumping to
    >>>> conclusions about me.
    >>>>
    >>>> Regarding business law, this has not been a specialty of mine,
    >>>> but it is not new either, and it has gone hand in hand with my
    >>>> real estate practice. I have set up many LLCs for real estate
    >>>> and condominium developers, and I have dealt with their
    >>>> pertinent business issues. I am associated with a good CPA
    >>>> (his office is right across the street from mine) who works
    >>>> with me on the tax issues. I have already associated myself
    >>>> with an employment lawyer for employee issues, if and when the
    >>>> time comes, and I have someone (an old boss, as a matter of
    >>>> fact) who guides me on licensing issues (part of his municipal
    >>>> law concentration).
    >>>>
    >>>> Malpractice claims? I have had none. My bankruptcy clients
    >>>> receive their discharges. My real estate developers finish
    >>>> their projects, sell their real estate under the LLCs I
    >>>> create, make their money, pay me (quite well), and are
    >>>> shielded from personal liability. A number of my clients have
    >>>> passed away and my wills have withstood probate, including one
    >>>> that was challenged by a family member who was written out of
    >>>> the will. My real estate buyers re-sell their properties with
    >>>> no title issues, when I was the one who certified title. In
    >>>> fact, of the many hundreds of title insurance policies I have
    >>>> issued, I have yet to have a claim.
    >>>>
    >>>> I make money and stay out of trouble, because I know my
    >>>> capabilities and limitations. It's not hard to find other
    >>>> lawyers who are willing and able to work with you. In fact,
    >>>> it's part of the relationship-building process I advocate.
    >>>> This is how a solo runs a business. Someone once told me (my
    >>>> municipal law boss referred to above, as a matter of fact)
    >>>> that as a solo, you have to "bob and weave". This is what I
    >>>> do - I bob and weave. This does not make me "one of the most
    >>>> amazing lawyers in the world" (your juvenile words). It
    >>>> makes me one more solo who knows how to run a practice.
    >>>>
    >>>> I write posts with the hope that someone might be helped, and
    >>>> I read posts with the hope that I might be helped. I do not
    >>>> spend time here with the intent of leading someone down the
    >>>> wrong road. It seems that whenever I post something, someone
    >>>> like you attacks me. This is why I had given up on this board.
    >>>> I tried to come back, but right now I cannot understand why.
    >>>>
    >>>> You have accused me of either being a "pie in sky bragging of
    >>>> a fool who is too stupid to know what type of malpractice
    >>>> claims await him" or "a lawyer who is both quite skilled but
    >>>> also a bit of a sadistic twerp spewing this nonsense to
    >>>> desperate people so that he can laugh while they get
    >>>> themselves in over there heads". I have demonstrated that I am
    >>>> neither.
    >>>>
    >>>> Mr. Nathan, now that I have put you in your place, you are
    >>>> dismissed. Grow up.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 5/16/06, joe nathan wrote:
    >>>>> I don't want to imply that you are telling lies or suggest
    >>>>> that you are not capable, but you're either one of the most
    >>>>> amazing lawyers in the world or you have a load of
    >>>>> malpractice claims waiting to surface.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Business law (i guess you mean corporate - tax issues
    >>>>> included), will & trusts, real estate, and bankruptcy are
    >>>> all
    >>>>> unique practice areas with their own twists and turns. one
    >>>>> ordinarily does not float so freely from one of these
    >>>>> practice areas to the other without a fair number of
    >>>>> mistakes. in fact, even seasoned practitioners in each of
    >>>>> these areas make many mistakes and often serious mistakes
    >>>>> with malpractice consequences. perhaps you have years of
    >>>>> practice experience, but you may have little in the areas
    >>>>> that you are trying to transition to. that still makes you
    >>>> a
    >>>>> beginner.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> in the end, i really don't think you practice competently in
    >>>>> all of the different areas you skate through. maybe you do;
    >>>>> its possible. but you really should think twice about
    >>>>> offering this type of advice to struggling solos who will do
    >>>>> anything for a buck. they just might take you up on it. if
    >>>>> you are in fact competant in each of these areas, it must
    >>>>> dawn on you that there are complications that someone of
    >>>> less
    >>>>> skill than you could easily stumble over.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> anyone reading this should take this for what it is - either
    >>>>> the pie in sky bragging of a fool who is too stupid to know
    >>>>> what type of malpractice claims await him or a lawyer who is
    >>>>> both quite skilled but also a bit of a sadistic twerp
    >>>> spewing
    >>>>> this nonsense to desperate people so that he can laugh while
    >>>>> they get themselves in over there heads. on the other hand,
    >>>>> if you're like many solos there is nothing much for a
    >>>>> malpractice plaintfiff to take from you - unless of course
    >>>>> they would like to have the sheriff come out and seize your
    >>>>> student loan notes. in that case, maybe this isn't so bad.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 5/15/06, JF wrote:
    >>>>>> For better or for worse, I continue to occasionally write
    >>>>>> posts that may actually help those drowning solos actually
    >>>>>> build their practices. I have been practicing real estate
    >>>>>> law for a number of years, but the downturn in the real
    >>>>>> estate market has forced me to expand into other areas. I
    >>>>>> have had no problem obtaining new clients and new types of
    >>>>>> work, and I do this by fishing where the fish are. For
    >>>>>> example, in the past, I have suggested that solos hand
    >>>>>> out "Have You Made a Will?" brochures to their existing
    >>>>>> clients. A great way to get your client to come in for
    >>>>>> some estate planning. When the new bankruptcy law went
    >>>>>> into effect, many bankruptcy lawyers dropped that area of
    >>>>>> practice. I spent an afternoon on the phone calling these
    >>>>>> lawyers, telling them that I am practicing bankruptcy law,
    >>>>>> and now a number of them have used me as their referral
    >>>>>> attorney. I originally built my real estate practice by
    >>>>>> opening my office next door to a large, busy real estate
    >>>>>> broker office. The referrals came quickly and
    >>>>>> consistently. Again, fishing where the fish are. All this
    >>>>>> has been supplemented by bar lawyer referral programs.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> My newest marketing endeavor targets business entities,
    >>>>>> who (in my opinion) ultimately make the best clients. I
    >>>>>> had ignored business clients in the past (with the
    >>>>>> exception of real estate developers) largely because I did
    >>>>>> not believe there were many new businesses in my area, and
    >>>>>> existing businesses typically already have counsel. Then I
    >>>>>> checked the new business certificate filings in the city
    >>>>>> that I practice in and found that there are many new
    >>>>>> business filings every month. I have been active in the
    >>>>>> local Chamber of Commerce for over a year, and I am the
    >>>>>> only lawyer who gives them my time. So I simply called the
    >>>>>> Chamber director, who confirmed that, yes, a good amount
    >>>>>> of new business people call her for lawyer referrals, and
    >>>>>> from now on she will certainly give them my name (since
    >>>>>> I'm the only lawyer in town who bothers with them). I had
    >>>>>> my first client within a week. Granted, many of these new
    >>>>>> businesses will fail, but I will receive the start-up work
    >>>>>> and retain those that succeed.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Virtually all solos know how to practice law. The hard
    >>>>>> part is obtaining clients, which seems to be the problem
    >>>>>> people have here. The work is out there; you just have to
    >>>>>> reach out and grab it. It's all about relationship
    >>>>>> building, making yourself visible in the community, and
    >>>>>> letting people know what you do.
    >>>>>>

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by JF.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by Jimmy.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by JF.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by Ronald.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by JF.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/15/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by JF.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by Ronald.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by JF.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/16/06, by joe nathan.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by JF.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by RJon@HowToMakeItRain.com.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by Honorable Gentleman.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by The Zephyr.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/17/06, by Carlos.
  • Re: Internet Advertising, 5/17/06, by The Zephyr.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/18/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/18/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles.
  • Re: Meanwhile, for those of you who practice law....., 5/18/06, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.