Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu
Posted by Carl Jackson on 11/29/06
On 11/29/06, Bobs Biff wrote: > Your message was designed to drive traffic and a higher > google ranking to the website you linked to. As such, your > post was not sincere and will not get a serious response. > Whoops, I didn't mean to do that at all. I didn't think I was "linking" to another website by posting the address in the message. I am very sorry about all that. Consider that part of my original posting scratched, but the rest of it sincere. Why would I bother to type so much about my situation if I wasn't sincere. Thanks, C.J.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, but..., 11/28/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Bobs Biff.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Egon.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Smith.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by Smith.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 12/01/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 12/08/06, by kristi.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 12/08/06, by JF.
|