Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007
Posted by Dejnave on 1/02/07
Sounds more like a law clerk thing. On 12/31/06, rrr wrote: > Its a Lawyer thing, you wouldn't understand. > > On 12/30/06, Dejnave wrote: >> I don't get it. You post about how this profession almost >> ruined your life and now you come back for more. Why? >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12/30/06, rrr wrote: >>> An Update for the non-trolls... >>> >>> So after mulling it over, I've decided to go back to >>> Practice. I didn't want to go solo so I started looking >>> for an Attorney Job. As I started looking, I started >>> running into solos and small firms that were interested in >>> a part-time addition but not full time. So now I am >> working >>> as a part -timer. Which suits me fine for now. >>> Compensation... $40 per hour billed. I use their office, >>> their computers, their printers, etc. while working on >>> their work. >>> >>> If the chemistry is right, it might be useful to work out >>> some kind of arrangement where I bring in work to the firm >>> and give them a percentage to pay for overhead used. >>> Haven't thought through the percentage yet. I'm going to >>> scope out office suites in the general area to see what my >>> minimal overhead would be if I went solo. >>> >>> Technically, I'm not sure if this is "going solo", I think >>> its mediary between being an Associate for a Firm, and >>> being Solo. >>> >>> At this point I don't have any particular marketing plan, >>> but then again I have no overhead. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/31/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Carol.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/03/07, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/05/07, by would-be solo.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/06/07, by rrr.
|