Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007
Posted by rrr on 12/31/06
Its a Lawyer thing, you wouldn't understand. On 12/30/06, Dejnave wrote: > I don't get it. You post about how this profession almost > ruined your life and now you come back for more. Why? > > > > > > On 12/30/06, rrr wrote: >> An Update for the non-trolls... >> >> So after mulling it over, I've decided to go back to >> Practice. I didn't want to go solo so I started looking >> for an Attorney Job. As I started looking, I started >> running into solos and small firms that were interested in >> a part-time addition but not full time. So now I am > working >> as a part -timer. Which suits me fine for now. >> Compensation... $40 per hour billed. I use their office, >> their computers, their printers, etc. while working on >> their work. >> >> If the chemistry is right, it might be useful to work out >> some kind of arrangement where I bring in work to the firm >> and give them a percentage to pay for overhead used. >> Haven't thought through the percentage yet. I'm going to >> scope out office suites in the general area to see what my >> minimal overhead would be if I went solo. >> >> Technically, I'm not sure if this is "going solo", I think >> its mediary between being an Associate for a Firm, and >> being Solo. >> >> At this point I don't have any particular marketing plan, >> but then again I have no overhead. >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/31/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Carol.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/03/07, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/05/07, by would-be solo.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/06/07, by rrr.
|