Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition
Posted by sjklevickis on 2/27/05
That is a terrifying notion. After telephone conversations with many in my county (Santa Clara), I was able to ascertain on short order that roughly 98% of them were unwilling to take a case in Placer County--where this petition originated. {Home turf issue} Now that it's actually begun, my attorney said recently that it's the most contensious case my he has ever had (many years in family and civil law). I was hoping it was a "style" issue, rather than any sort of incompetence, in terms of his not providing much reassurance. Eeek. On 2/27/05, sharwinston wrote: > Then you need a new attorney ASAP. > > On 2/27/05, sjklevickis wrote: >> Indeed... I have an attorney and he doesn't offer much hope or >> reassurance. I suppose it would be nice to find out if such >> litigation is so terribly uncommon no one would dare take it, >> or if so sticky with family issues that courts won't hear the >> cases? My attorney tends to want to focus on the very near >> term future rather than the bigger picture it seems. >>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- third party non-custodial guardianship petition--no merit, 2/27/05, by sjklevickis.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sharwinston.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sjklevickis.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sharwinston.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sjklevickis.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sharwinston.
|