Re: Apportionment really sucks in California
Posted by Jeep Drewtt, Atty. on 6/15/05
Dear Peggy,
Best of luck to you. Hang in there and be tough! Sincerly, Jeep in Lake Charles On 6/15/05, Peggy wrote: > Well I said that I would let you all know what happen > today in my hearing. > WHAT A JOKE!!! > California is a joke run by a joker. > I have been on w/c for 4 years now with buldging disc c2 > through c7 in my neck, lower back fusion due to what they > call a birth defect. I have also had carpel tunnel > surgery. That was all they could do for me or all w/c > would do for me. I was denied for so much treatment > (traction for my neck)plus much more. I also have Poland > Syndrome. Which is a birth defect that does not let your > pectoralis muscle to grow and deformities in the hand. I > am missing a thumb. > So anyway now that you are caught up here is what happened > at my hearing today... > > There Doctor gave me a 75&37; apportionment and mine gave me > 30&37; and they are putting it all towards Poland Syndrome. > So I got a big settlement of 20 thou. 12 of that goes to > what they have already paid me and then 15&37; to the > attorney. So I don't get much at all. So guess what, I am > going to trial. I thought it was a total insult. > So now I have to go out and find a Dr. that will let them > know that one has nothing to do with the other. The > adjusters do not even know what poland syndrome is. > Any way I will write more later. I am sofa king upset > right now I think I will have a couple of drinks . What > the hell right. They can't take that away from me. Have a > nice night all.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Apportionment really sucks in California, 6/15/05, by Peggy.
- Re: Apportionment really sucks in California, 6/15/05, by Jeep Drewtt, Atty..
- Re: Apportionment really sucks in California, 6/18/05, by SWEETPAPILOVE.
|