Re: who knows what we can do?
Posted by Eve on 10/04/05
yes: my boyfriend was a passenger in the drunk drivers car. yes: there was another car involved, but that one was not at fault. There was no discussion about that. Yes: the driver was sued, but we never heard the outcome of that case. I checked with the mother again to make sure and she confirmed me that she never signed anything like that. But I do not understand; it seems logical to me; she signs and then receives the check. But she did not sign a thing and got the money withdrawn on a bank account. On 10/02/05, Unknown Paralegal wrote: > > OO > > You are so WRONG about every thing you have told this lady. And > apparently you have NO idea what you are talking about. So go away. > Keep your WRONG advice to yourself. And yes, the check is MADE OUT > TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE ATTORNEY. BUT IN THIS CASE, (if this lady > is telling the truth) THEN THE MOTHER WILL SIGN THE CHECK. This lady > said the mother is the CONSERVATOR. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT - kid. > > > On 10/02/05, 00 wrote: >> The mother does NOT have to sign the check. The man was capable of >> making this decision. Therefore, no one else has any legals rights >> in this case. >> >> On 10/02/05, Unknown Paralegal wrote: >>> >>> What you are saying is, your boyfriend was a passenger in the >>> same vehicle the drunk driver was driving? Yes or No. And, there >>> was only one vehicle involved in the accident? Yes or No. And, >>> the driver was sued? Yes or No. >>> If the driver has liability bodily injury insurance, then, the >>> driver cannot be sued personal/independently away from the >>> liability bodily injury insurance - you have already sued him. >>> And it sounds like the insurer tendered their policy limits. It >>> sounds like the case settled in pre-litigation? >>> To release the defendant from liability the release form has to >>> be signed. Once the release form has been signed then the case >>> is closed. If the release form has NOT been signed, and the >>> insurance company HAS tendered the policy limits - case is still >>> OPEN AND THE CHECK CANNOT BE CASHED. THE RELEASE FORM SIGNING >>> COMES FIRST - BEFORE THE CHECK IS DEPOSITED IN THE TRUST ACCOUNT. >>> THE MOTHER HAS TO SIGN THE CHECK. >>> >>> On 10/02/05, Eve wrote: >>>> His mother never signed a paper to release the defendant. >>>> Actually... the lawyer settled with the car insurance from the >>>> driver, but never went after the driver himself. >>>> My boyfriend was sitting in the car from the driver. (as a >>>> passenger). So he did not drive. >>>> >>>> For more questions please do not hesitate to ask ... >>>> >>>> On 10/02/05, Unknown Paralegal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Eve, >>>>> >>>>> NOT SO FAST. FIND OUT SOME OF THESE FACTS. Personal injury >>>>> law isn't soooo easy - so tell us more of the facts. >>>>> >>>>> If what you are saying is truthful, then, yes something >>>>> doens't said right. If his mother never SIGNED a RELEASE >>>>> form releasing the defendant or defendants from liability >>>>> then the case isn't closed. You need to tell us if your >>>>> boyfriend was riding in another vehicle driven by someone >>>>> else and the drunk driver hit them. Or was your boyfriend >>>>> renting a vehicle and he was the driver of one vehicle and >>>>> the drunk driver then hit him. You need to tell us more >>>>> about the vehicles involved - HOW MANY, DRIVEN BY WHOM AND >>>>> WAS YOUR BOYFRIEND A DRIVER AND IF SO, WHOSE VEHICLE WAS HE >>>>> DRIVING. Was he a pedestrian. All of this will make a >>>>> difference. >>>>> >>>>> On 10/02/05, Eve wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm a Belgian woman, living in Belgium with an American >>>>>> problem. >>>>>> My boyfriend was the victim of a drunken driver in Denver >>>>>> Colorado (february 2002). He was in a coma, brain damage, >>>>>> he is disabled for more then 66&37;, will never be able to >>>>>> take care for himself, et cetera. >>>>>> We took a lawyer, he settled for 250.000 US dollars (took >>>>>> 33&37;) that leaves 160.000 US dollars for my boyfriend. >>>>>> CAN WE FIGHT THAT SETTLEMENT? >>>>>> That does not compensate the losses we had, never earn >>>>>> money because he is not able to work! >>>>>> Is this possible, is there nothing we can do about this? >>>>>> please... let us know! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/03/05, by Kacy.
- Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/04/05, by Eve.
|