Follow us!

    Re: who knows what we can do?

    Posted by Eve on 10/04/05

    yes: my boyfriend was a passenger in the drunk drivers car.
    yes: there was another car involved, but that one was not at fault.
    There was no discussion about that.
    Yes: the driver was sued, but we never heard the outcome of that case.

    I checked with the mother again to make sure and she confirmed me that
    she never signed anything like that.
    But I do not understand; it seems logical to me; she signs and then
    receives the check.
    But she did not sign a thing and got the money withdrawn on a bank
    account.

    On 10/02/05, Unknown Paralegal wrote:
    >
    > OO
    >
    > You are so WRONG about every thing you have told this lady. And
    > apparently you have NO idea what you are talking about. So go
    away.
    > Keep your WRONG advice to yourself. And yes, the check is MADE OUT
    > TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE ATTORNEY. BUT IN THIS CASE, (if this lady
    > is telling the truth) THEN THE MOTHER WILL SIGN THE CHECK. This
    lady
    > said the mother is the CONSERVATOR. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT - kid.
    >
    >
    > On 10/02/05, 00 wrote:
    >> The mother does NOT have to sign the check. The man was capable of
    >> making this decision. Therefore, no one else has any legals rights
    >> in this case.
    >>
    >> On 10/02/05, Unknown Paralegal wrote:
    >>>
    >>> What you are saying is, your boyfriend was a passenger in the
    >>> same vehicle the drunk driver was driving? Yes or No. And, there
    >>> was only one vehicle involved in the accident? Yes or No. And,
    >>> the driver was sued? Yes or No.
    >>> If the driver has liability bodily injury insurance, then, the
    >>> driver cannot be sued personal/independently away from the
    >>> liability bodily injury insurance - you have already sued him.
    >>> And it sounds like the insurer tendered their policy limits. It
    >>> sounds like the case settled in pre-litigation?
    >>> To release the defendant from liability the release form has to
    >>> be signed. Once the release form has been signed then the case
    >>> is closed. If the release form has NOT been signed, and the
    >>> insurance company HAS tendered the policy limits - case is still
    >>> OPEN AND THE CHECK CANNOT BE CASHED. THE RELEASE FORM SIGNING
    >>> COMES FIRST - BEFORE THE CHECK IS DEPOSITED IN THE TRUST ACCOUNT.
    >>> THE MOTHER HAS TO SIGN THE CHECK.
    >>>
    >>> On 10/02/05, Eve wrote:
    >>>> His mother never signed a paper to release the defendant.
    >>>> Actually... the lawyer settled with the car insurance from the
    >>>> driver, but never went after the driver himself.
    >>>> My boyfriend was sitting in the car from the driver. (as a
    >>>> passenger). So he did not drive.
    >>>>
    >>>> For more questions please do not hesitate to ask ...
    >>>>
    >>>> On 10/02/05, Unknown Paralegal wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Eve,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> NOT SO FAST. FIND OUT SOME OF THESE FACTS. Personal injury
    >>>>> law isn't soooo easy - so tell us more of the facts.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If what you are saying is truthful, then, yes something
    >>>>> doens't said right. If his mother never SIGNED a RELEASE
    >>>>> form releasing the defendant or defendants from liability
    >>>>> then the case isn't closed. You need to tell us if your
    >>>>> boyfriend was riding in another vehicle driven by someone
    >>>>> else and the drunk driver hit them. Or was your boyfriend
    >>>>> renting a vehicle and he was the driver of one vehicle and
    >>>>> the drunk driver then hit him. You need to tell us more
    >>>>> about the vehicles involved - HOW MANY, DRIVEN BY WHOM AND
    >>>>> WAS YOUR BOYFRIEND A DRIVER AND IF SO, WHOSE VEHICLE WAS HE
    >>>>> DRIVING. Was he a pedestrian. All of this will make a
    >>>>> difference.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 10/02/05, Eve wrote:
    >>>>>> Hello,
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I'm a Belgian woman, living in Belgium with an American
    >>>>>> problem.
    >>>>>> My boyfriend was the victim of a drunken driver in Denver
    >>>>>> Colorado (february 2002). He was in a coma, brain damage,
    >>>>>> he is disabled for more then 66&37;, will never be able to
    >>>>>> take care for himself, et cetera.
    >>>>>> We took a lawyer, he settled for 250.000 US dollars (took
    >>>>>> 33&37;) that leaves 160.000 US dollars for my boyfriend.
    >>>>>> CAN WE FIGHT THAT SETTLEMENT?
    >>>>>> That does not compensate the losses we had, never earn
    >>>>>> money because he is not able to work!
    >>>>>> Is this possible, is there nothing we can do about this?
    >>>>>> please... let us know!
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Eve.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by 00.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/02/05, by Unknown Paralegal .
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/03/05, by Kacy.
  • Re: who knows what we can do?, 10/04/05, by Eve.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.