Follow us!

    Re: Q.M.E. & Expert Medical Witness for defense lied BIG.

    Posted by clayton on 12/18/08

    The QME I went to did the same exact thing. I have a c4-c5
    fusion.


    On 5/07/07, Scott Douglas MacLachlan wrote:
    > Advice to those selecting a Q.M.E., DO YOUR RESEARCH!
    > After a debilitating spinal injury, I was informed by a
    > W.C. atty. that due to Arnold's SB-899 & a previous lumbar
    > discectomy, "there was not enough money in it for either
    > of us", and to apply for Soc. Security disability, ASAP
    > and "go the Q.M.E. route".
    > Provided with a choice of 3, (finding after truly shocking
    > Q.M.E. Report) I had selected a state appointed Qualified
    > Medical Evaluator who also charges insurance companies up
    > to $8,000 per day to testify on behalf of insurance
    > companies in personal injury jury trials.
    > Though in exam this physician informed me of a new injury
    > (not present in 11 month old MRI), and stated I needed a
    > spinal fusion, later corroborated by 3 other surgeons.
    > BUT, his report buries the new condition as pre-existing,
    > fails to mention need for fusion, and paints me as being
    > the "picture of health", (contradicting 25+ records he
    > added to his own report of untreated severe ankle &
    > shoulder injuries from other physician's,) effectively
    > destroying any chance at Soc. Security benefits.
    > Five months after injury, my right leg began to collapse,
    > recently my left, and right ankle is completely numb.
    > Amongst many, many other malicious misreporting, this
    > Q.M.E. completely ignored a WCAB judge's instructions to
    > provide a rebuttal to a Court ordered second opinion, who
    > found me in need of a 2 level lumbar fusion, as well
    > as “Temp. Total Disabled”, unlike the first Q.M.E. He was
    > also admonished by the Dept. of Industrial Relations
    > Medical Unit (who appointed and recently investigated this
    > physician) for procedural misconduct in arriving at his
    > opinion that I was not a qualified injured worker.
    > Lawyers don't see this as a slam-dunk, so I'm screwed.
    > BUT my word to the wise, select your Q.M.E. with care!
    >
    > Am co-producing an investigative documentary regarding
    > such “Conflict Of Interest”, and medical/insurance
    > corruption and am currently seeking (explained in less
    > than two pages) from other people with their own W.C. &
    > Q.M.E. stories for the film.
    > I may request documentation to back-up certain story
    > points, but will be handled with the utmost discretion. I
    > know the pain of reliving your experience by retelling you
    > story again, and again, but your contribution may make a
    > difference for us, as well as others like us in the
    > future. laaxe@yahoo.com
    > Thank you, Scott MacLachlan

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Q.M.E. & Expert Medical Witness for defense lied BIG., 5/07/07, by Scott Douglas MacLachlan.
  • Re: Q.M.E. & Expert Medical Witness for defense lied BIG., 12/18/08, by clayton.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.