Follow us!

    Post: Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk

    Posted by Michael Collins on 5/27/08

    I was accused in 11/2002 by the Kirkland WA. Police
    department of theft. The detective told me that if I left
    the state of Washington the case would never go forward.

    I was formally charged without my knowledge in Aug 2004
    and of course there is a warrent for Theft I in King
    County Washington Superior Court...

    My accuser since then is facing a 7+ Felony count
    indictment by the US govt and is awaiting trial. In the
    indictment is clearly states that "As defendant xxxx xxxx
    knew, all of the documents described in
    paragraph 5 were false and fraudulent because he
    instructed defendant yyyyyy to create
    those documents using false information supplied by
    defendant xxxx. As defendant xxxxx
    further knew, defendant yyyy created each of the false
    documents using a personal computer at
    company xyz."

    What is a reasonable fee for an atty to present all this
    to the prosecutor's office and get this dropped?

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk, 5/27/08, by Michael Collins.
  • Re: Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk, 5/27/08, by Curmudgeon.

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.