Follow us!

    Re: Socratic Method

    Posted by Karen on 2/04/09

    Here's what Taf t has to say on their website:

    A. The case method, also often referred to as the Socratic
    method, is a method of learning first implemented by in the
    early 20th century by Harvard and Columbia law schools. The
    case method requires students examine ("brief") and discuss
    actual court decisions. In recent years a growing number of
    legal educators have expressed dissatisfaction with this
    model. In 2007 the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education
    released a report which recommended sweeping changes in how
    law was taught. These recommendations included de-emphasizing
    the case method of instruction.

    While the Carnegie report questioned the value of the case
    method in classroom programs, our experience has shown that it
    has even less value in a distance learning program.
    Historically the greater emphasis a distance law school places
    on the case method, the lower the bar examination pass rate.
    Most Taft Law School courses utilize "casebooks," but of equal
    importance are treatises, outlines, recorded lectures and
    other study aids.

    On 2/04/09, atty wrote:
    > Right on point. I also believe that the Socratic Method is
    > pure waste of time. I remember most students in my class used
    > to check emails or browse the Internet during the class. Only
    > a few used to participate in the discussions. These students
    > (I was among one of them most of the time) were in the class
    > because the attendance was required (and I am talking about
    > one of the top ranking schools). I always learned through
    > reading.
    > On 2/03/09, Iggyrip wrote:
    >> One of the previous posts, mentioned their school taught
    >> by the Socratic Method. This stirred some past memories
    >> and I thought I would kick this around to see how people
    >> felt about it.
    >> I spent a year at a Cal Bar arroved school who taught by
    >> the Socratic Method. I thought it was a waste of time. Too
    >> much time discussing cases and not enough time learning
    >> the law and how to write an essay. It has it's place, but
    >> I believe that law can be taught in a more efficient
    >> manner. Case in point: After law school, just about
    >> everyone attends a bar review to learn the law (or what
    >> was forgotten) and how to write for the exam. There is no
    >> Socratic Method teaching in bar review. Why do law schools
    >> continue to teach this way? Tradition? Or it is really the
    >> best way to teach law?
    >> Does anyone agree?
    >> Iggy

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Socratic Method, 2/03/09, by Iggyrip.
  • Re: Socratic Method, 2/03/09, by Argo.
  • Re: Socratic Method, 2/03/09, by ABA grad.
  • Re: Socratic Method, 2/04/09, by atty.
  • Re: Socratic Method, 2/04/09, by Karen.
  • Re: Socratic Method, 2/04/09, by Think Like a Lawyer.

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.