Re: Criminal Law Question
Posted by T. Hall on 10/07/07
The cleaners would have custody of the dress as a bailment. would may be guily of pety theft for not paying for services rendered. This is really more of a civil matter than criminal because if it wasn't a dress and instead a car and the same thing happened at an auto-shop, the auto-shop would have to sue for payment of services rendered. Jill shouldn't have much to worry about criminally. I do have to agree that it would be much easier to just return, pay, and walk away from the situation. On 9/27/07, Ozarks Lawyer wrote: > As a practical matter, Jill, it would be cheaper to return to > the dry cleaners and settle up rather than pay an attorney to > get you out of trouble. > > > > > On 9/24/07, Law Student wrote: >> Jill takes her party dress to a dry cleaners. Returning to >> pick it up, she notices it hanging unattended. Jill takes >> her dress without paying. Is Jill guilty of larceny? Did >> the dry cleaners have custody or possession of the dress? >> What is Jill guilty of if not larceny?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Criminal Law Question, 9/24/07, by Law Student.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 9/27/07, by Ozarks Lawyer.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 9/30/07, by law student.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 9/30/07, by Res Ipsa Loquitur.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/01/07, by law student.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/01/07, by law student.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/01/07, by Ozarks Lawyer.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/01/07, by law student.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/01/07, by law student.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/03/07, by Res Ipsa Loquitur.
- Re: Criminal Law Question, 10/07/07, by T. Hall.
|