Re: Beware of Con-Artists and Thieves = PGDC
Posted by No Tolerance For Con-Artists. on 6/22/03
PGDC,
How can they be your 'clients' if they are pro-se?
Pro-se means that a person represents themselves.
As your site admits, you are charging your 'clients'
>$595.95 Per Case???Only at PGDC...
>COMING SOON: PGDC SHALL GLADY ACCEPT:
>MASTERCARD,DISCOVER AND VISA FOR ALL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES..
You don't even have the guts to use your real names.
The bottom line: you are not admitted to practice law, and
you are ripping off unsuspecting consumers by engaging in the
unauthorized practice of law. That's why the cases were
dismissed. You are a bunch of con-artists and thieves.
Stop trying to steal peoples money. If you post here again,
I will file a complaint with the New York State Bar against
you. Engaging in the unauthorized practice of law is a
criminal offense.
No Tolerance For Con-Artists.
On 6/11/03, PGDC LEGAL UNIT wrote:
> OUR CLIENTS FILED THREE CASES IN THE FEDERAL COURT IN
> BROOKLYN, NY AS A PRO SE, THEY WERE DENIED ALL RIGHTS TO
> FAIR DUE PROCESS, CASES WERE DISMISSED WITHOUT EXPLANATION,
> REFUSED THE CASES TO BE HEARD IN FRONT OF A JURY, BIAS ,
> YES, CORRUPT , YES, THE JUDGES NAMES ARE:
> JOHN GLEESON
> LOIS BLOOM
>
> ANYONE HAVING BEEN DENIED BY THESE JUDGES, PLEASE CONTACT US
> AT pgdc.tv
> THANK YOU
On 6/11/03, PGDC LEGAL UNIT wrote:
> OUR CLIENTS FILED THREE CASES IN THE FEDERAL COURT IN
> BROOKLYN, NY AS A PRO SE, THEY WERE DENIED ALL RIGHTS TO
> FAIR DUE PROCESS, CASES WERE DISMISSED WITHOUT EXPLANATION,
> REFUSED THE CASES TO BE HEARD IN FRONT OF A JURY, BIAS ,
> YES, CORRUPT , YES, THE JUDGES NAMES ARE:
> JOHN GLEESON
> LOIS BLOOM
>
> ANYONE HAVING BEEN DENIED BY THESE JUDGES, PLEASE CONTACT US
> AT pgdc.tv
> THANK YOU
Posts on this thread, including this one
- PRO SE AND FEDERAL JUDGES A BAD MIX, 6/11/03, by PGDC LEGAL UNIT.
- Re: Beware of Con-Artists and Thieves = PGDC, 6/22/03, by No Tolerance For Con-Artists. .
- Re: Beware of Con-Artists and Thieves = PGDC, 11/21/03, by To No Tolerance.