Post: Kidney Transplant
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab77/7ab77609ea50f381c51b773802d8ee9c313a8f7c" alt=""
Posted by Nise on 4/10/07
Back in 2002 my brother had a kidney transplant, that of which was perfectly healthy AND a perfect match, that was donated by our living, breathing niece. He had many doctors on his case, all with different courses of action to take regarding any aftercare. Through the years he has been plagued with one problem after another, and it has only been since this transplant. One doctor viewing his medical records kept shaking his head and flat-out told my brother that none of these things should have EVER happened to him, and guaranteed if he did the next transplant that it would NOT happen again. Fast forward to today...he is on the transplant list for another kidney, and has been for almost 3 and a half years now and it has been brought to light that the kidney that our niece donated was killed due to overmedication, and we now hear that the transplant center where he had the first transplant has been shut down. Now he may also need a heart transplant in addition to another kidney. There really are too many complications to list here. My question...what is the statute of limitations in California for medical malpractice? This just does not seem right that my brother and the family have gone through absolute HELL due to something that truly was a result of doctors in medical practice. Now we know why they call it "PRACTICE". Any response will be welcomed. Thank you.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Kidney Transplant, 4/10/07, by Nise.
|