Posted by Keith Eaton on 12/22/12

More | Report Post

When Roe v Wade was decided 98% of all doctors had taken
the hippocratic oath a binding contract enabling legal
license to practice. The constitution protects contracts
from ex post facto or interference with contracts by new
laws or rulings. Why wasnt the ruling a tortious
interference with many thousands of existing contracts?

Roe v Wade and contracts, 12/22/12, by Keith Eaton.

Plaintiff Attorneys Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST