Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702)
Posted by tcnaff on 8/13/07
On 8/13/07, annon. wrote: > On 8/13/07, tnaff wrote: >> Does the individual who SENDS mail that was opened--and >> destroyed--by someone other than the addressee have any >> recourse against the person who is responsible for >> obstruction of correspondence? > > You have correctly cited the applicable statute. The > recourse of 18 USC § 1702 is for the government to pursue. > As an individual, anyone may make a complaint to the > authorities about a violation of § 1702 then it is up to the > federal prosecutor whether or not to make a case. (even a > neighbor who has no stake in the mail in question could > bring a criminal complaint to the authorities) No > compensation is available under § 1702 for an individual who > has been wronged. However, anyone who has suffered a loss > because of a violation of § 1702 (such as the sender) could > of course bring a civil action for damages. You could bring > that action in a state court or possibly in federal court if > the civil complaint is based on a federal question. > > ************************************** > 18 USCS § 1702 > > § 1702. Obstruction of correspondence > > Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any > post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or > from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any > post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of > any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to > the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct > the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets > of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the > same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more > than five years, or both.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tnaff.
- Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by annon..
- Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tcnaff.
- Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tcnaff.
- Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tcnaff.
|