Follow us!

    Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702)

    Posted by tcnaff on 8/13/07

    On 8/13/07, annon. wrote:
    > On 8/13/07, tnaff wrote:
    >> Does the individual who SENDS mail that was opened--and
    >> destroyed--by someone other than the addressee have any
    >> recourse against the person who is responsible for
    >> obstruction of correspondence?
    >
    > You have correctly cited the applicable statute. The
    > recourse of 18 USC § 1702 is for the government to pursue.
    > As an individual, anyone may make a complaint to the
    > authorities about a violation of § 1702 then it is up to the
    > federal prosecutor whether or not to make a case. (even a
    > neighbor who has no stake in the mail in question could
    > bring a criminal complaint to the authorities) No
    > compensation is available under § 1702 for an individual who
    > has been wronged. However, anyone who has suffered a loss
    > because of a violation of § 1702 (such as the sender) could
    > of course bring a civil action for damages. You could bring
    > that action in a state court or possibly in federal court if
    > the civil complaint is based on a federal question.
    >
    > **************************************
    > 18 USCS § 1702
    >
    > § 1702. Obstruction of correspondence
    >
    > Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any
    > post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or
    > from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any
    > post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of
    > any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to
    > the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct
    > the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets
    > of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the
    > same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
    > than five years, or both.

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tnaff.
  • Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by annon..
  • Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tcnaff.
  • Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tcnaff.
  • Re: obstruction of correspondence (18 USC Section 1702), 8/13/07, by tcnaff.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.