Re: Right address, no name

More | Report Post

I'd say you're wrong, because to show entrapment you'd have to
demonstrate that the government induced you to commit a crime
you otherwise would not have.

On 4/04/06, Jason wrote:
> I'd say that's entrapment, which, as it turns out, is also
> against the law.
>
>
> On 4/03/06, Prairie Dawg wrote:
>> Yeah, sure, go ahead. Suppose it's dope or porn and there's
>> a sting going on. What will you say then?
>>
>> The betrter choice is to return it to the sender unopened.
>>
>>
>> On 3/31/06, Ryan wrote:
>>> I received a package sent to MY address that was not under
>>> my name nor addressed to anyone, just to the four letters
>>> (ex. A B C D) that make no sense. If the package was sent
>>> to my address can i open it?