Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence
Posted by john on 11/06/07
That's good news! Glad you got clear title without having to go through the expense of court. On 11/06/07, Duane wrote: > Just wanted to say Thanks John, for your most helpful input on my > query about my Adverse Possession posting. Including all others who > commented later. > > I am happy to relay that the property matter, in question, was > resolved in our favor without filing a Quiet Title Action thru the > Court. The hold out party aquiesced and signed a QUITCLAIM Deed, > conveying said property over to us, after they realized we had a > stronger Legal position. The recorded Court supporting documentation, > along with written family records and property tax payments proved to > be a more overwhelming claim to the property for us than I had > realized. > > So now after 45 years, I have finally been able to close the remaing > books on some old family business. This open forum was most helpful. > > On 7/22/07, john wrote: >> It looks like you have a good claim of adverse possession. I assume >> you may file a quiet title action to establish exclusive title to >> the property. The burden will be on you to show that you have >> fulfilled all the requirements of adverse possession. From what you >> have told me, you can do that. If the opposing party ignored your >> open, exclusive presence on the property for 29 years you are in >> good shape. >> >> One thing to remember; Do not accept any assurance from the other >> party that you now or ever had their permission to stay on the >> property. That is a trick! If you were to acknowledge that you had >> permission your possession would not be adverse. Best thing is to >> only communicate through court documents and hopefully you can have >> a lawyer do that. It will cost some $$ but it is far too risky to >> do yourself. Sounds like the other party is not prepared to contest >> a court action. You may get a default judgment if the other party >> fails to respond when you commence your action which will be the >> best possible result. >> >> Good luck!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquuiescence, 7/20/07, by Duane.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquuiescence, 7/22/07, by john.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by Duane.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by john.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by Duane.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by Duane.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by john.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 11/06/07, by Duane.
- Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 11/06/07, by john.
|