Follow us!

    Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence

    Posted by john on 11/06/07

    That's good news! Glad you got clear title without having to go through
    the expense of court.

    On 11/06/07, Duane wrote:
    > Just wanted to say Thanks John, for your most helpful input on my
    > query about my Adverse Possession posting. Including all others who
    > commented later.
    >
    > I am happy to relay that the property matter, in question, was
    > resolved in our favor without filing a Quiet Title Action thru the
    > Court. The hold out party aquiesced and signed a QUITCLAIM Deed,
    > conveying said property over to us, after they realized we had a
    > stronger Legal position. The recorded Court supporting documentation,
    > along with written family records and property tax payments proved to
    > be a more overwhelming claim to the property for us than I had
    > realized.
    >
    > So now after 45 years, I have finally been able to close the remaing
    > books on some old family business. This open forum was most helpful.
    >
    > On 7/22/07, john wrote:
    >> It looks like you have a good claim of adverse possession. I assume
    >> you may file a quiet title action to establish exclusive title to
    >> the property. The burden will be on you to show that you have
    >> fulfilled all the requirements of adverse possession. From what you
    >> have told me, you can do that. If the opposing party ignored your
    >> open, exclusive presence on the property for 29 years you are in
    >> good shape.
    >>
    >> One thing to remember; Do not accept any assurance from the other
    >> party that you now or ever had their permission to stay on the
    >> property. That is a trick! If you were to acknowledge that you had
    >> permission your possession would not be adverse. Best thing is to
    >> only communicate through court documents and hopefully you can have
    >> a lawyer do that. It will cost some $$ but it is far too risky to
    >> do yourself. Sounds like the other party is not prepared to contest
    >> a court action. You may get a default judgment if the other party
    >> fails to respond when you commence your action which will be the
    >> best possible result.
    >>
    >> Good luck!

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquuiescence, 7/20/07, by Duane.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquuiescence, 7/22/07, by john.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by Duane.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by john.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by Duane.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by Duane.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 7/22/07, by john.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 11/06/07, by Duane.
  • Re: Adverse Possession / Estoppel by Aquiescence, 11/06/07, by john.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.