Re: Experienced Legal Transcriptionists

More | Report Post

So you have so much work you're looking for subs yet you don't
post that on here. How odd.

It's very apparent that I don't have to waste any additional time
after today responding to this since the fiction in your responses
is readily apparent. If you recall, you took a test for our
agency after spouting off about your abilities and how you were
worth what you "said" your pay rates were. If you also recall,
you had the worst score we have ever recorded on sentence
structure, spelling, and the ability to adhere to a format. I
told you that based on your testing scores you would start at the
low end, i.e., the training end of our pay scale which insulted
you. That offer was only out of pity because you said you needed
work so badly. Now after the fact you are trying to turn that act
of kindness back against our agency for some unknown reason. That
alone speaks volumes about what type of an asset you would be to
any firm.

My suggestion to you is to stop wasting everyone's time here with
your childish posts since it's apparent that you have entered a
battle of wits unarmed.

On 2/25/08, Amazed wrote:
> No. Acutally, I have so much work that I was reading on here
> looking for someone that I might sub some of it out to. I just
> remember running across this dude several years ago and how
> condescending he was upon hearing my rates, and I thought it was
> interesting that he's still "constantly" looking for
> transcriptionists. Fast forward three years: I have more work
> than I can handle. I have to turn work away. I charge almost
> twice his page rate. Go figure: He's STILL looking. Some
> people just haven't figured out that you get what you pay for.
>
>
>
> On 2/20/08, Unamazed wrote:
>> Sounds like the rantings of someone who can't find a job and
>> has to post silly things like this to occupy their time.
>>
>> On 2/20/08, Amazed wrote:
>>> Woo Hoo. Are you still offering that whopping 85 cents a
>>> page? Hard to find quality for that, huh? Go figure.
>>>
>>> On 10/23/07, Hugh Lowrance wrote:
>>>> Our agency is constantly in the market for EXPERIENCED
>>>> legal transcriptionists with a background in deposition
>>>> transcript work. Applicants MUST have typing speeds in
>>>> excess of 75 words per minute and familiarity with
>>>> WordPerfect, not Word - only Word Perfect.
>>>>
>>>> If you feel you meet these qualifications, please e-mail
>>>> me at hugh@lowrancereporting.com and outline your
>>>> qualifications and experience as well as your expected
>>>> page rate. I seldom check this board so responding only
>>>> to this post will probably not get an answer.
>>>>
>>>> E-mails sent that do not outline qualifications and
>>>> experience will NOT be responded to.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hugh Lowrance