Follow us!

    Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page

    Posted by Rahman on 10/17/01

    On 10/16/01, Rahman wrote:
    > On 10/16/01, cbg wrote:
    >> On 10/16/01, Beth wrote:
    >>> On 8/25/01, anon wrote:
    >>>> If congress can't restrict the expression of religion, how
    >>>> is it they can 1)prohibit the display of Nativity scenes
    >>>> (just because it is on government property doesn't mean the
    >>>> government is endorsing it - it just shows free expression}
    >>>> and 2)the saying of "Merry Christmas" on the radio? You can
    >>>> only say "Happy Holidays" - "Merry Christmas" is in the
    >>>> same category as "f..." That seems a shame. Explain that
    >>>> to me legally.
    >>>
    >>> The Constitution calls for the separation of church and
    >>> state. That is the basis for the objections for displaying
    >>> religious-themed materials in gov't facilities, prayer in
    >>> pubic schools, etc.
    >>>
    >>> I don't quite know what you're talking about relative to
    >>> holiday greetings on the radio, but since radio stations are
    >>> not gov't entities, these choices would be a matter of
    >>> station policy, not constitutional issues. There are many
    >>> people in this country that don't observe Christmas - people
    >>> of the Jewish faith, Muslims, Buddists, etc. Perhaps some
    >>> radio stations have chosen "happy holidays" to be more
    >>> inclusive of all their listeners.
    >>
    >> Anon, in this area I agree with you, at least so far as the
    >> radio/television ads are concerned. For some reason it seems to
    >> be okay to say Happy Channukkah (my sincere apologies if I've
    >> misspelled it) and to wish everyone a Happy Kwanzaa, but Merry
    >> Christmas is forbidden. I'm sure Beth is right that they're
    >> trying to be inclusive, but it bothers me too.
    >
    >
    > The U.S. Constitution does NOT call for the seperation of "church
    > and State". Further, prayer IS allowed in schools. It becomes
    > violative of the first amendment when it is "lead" or "initiated"
    > "BY" the school or an extension thereof.
    >
    > With regard to the government endorsing the term "Merry
    > Christmas", this too is not violative of the First Amendment.
    > Where are you getting this information from?
    >

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • First Amendment as quoted on this page, 8/25/01, by anon.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 10/16/01, by Beth.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 10/16/01, by cbg.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 10/16/01, by Rahman.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 10/17/01, by Rahman.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 10/19/01, by Jayne Cucchiara.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/11/06, by tiffany.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/11/06, by Bob R/CA.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/11/06, by Res ispa Loquitur..
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/12/06, by Bob R/CA.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/12/06, by Res ispa Loquitur.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/12/06, by v.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/13/06, by Res ispa Loquitur .
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/13/06, by v.
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/14/06, by Res ispa Loquitur .
  • Re: First Amendment as quoted on this page, 12/15/06, by v.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.