Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives
Posted by sharwinston on 12/07/02
Shmuel, could you please clarify for me: Are you an American citizen living in Israel advocating repeal of America's 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? On 10/31/02, rrr wrote: > Are Palistinians allowed to carry guns? > > > > On 10/31/02, Shmuel Goldstein wrote: >> My thesis: Repeal the 2nd Amendment. >> >> I live in Israel. The so-called West Bank, to be precise. > Here in Israel, we >> do not have a 2nd Amendment, and no one here has a "right" > to bear arms. >> >> There are basically three ways in which your average > Israeli citizen can/does >> use arms: 1) He can acquire a license, then buy the weapon, > 2) Work for the >> Police or other security agency, 3) Do reserve duty >> >> Now, just about every man does reserve duty, and typically > the weapon used is >> an Uzi, M-16, or perhaps a Galil, which handles like an AK- > 47, and uses M-16 >> size bullets. >> >> In addition, reservists and regular army soldiers are all > over the country, and >> it is de riguer to see a 19 y/o soldier get on a bus with > an M-16 strapped >> around his shoulder. No one thinks anything of it. In fact, > there have been >> several incidents where one of these guys was near a > suicide bomber and stopped >> him by shooting him. >> >> In order for a regular citizen to acquire a weapon, say, a > pistol, he must >> undergo security checks, medical checks, and police checks. > It is not a given >> that he will receive a license for the weapon. Basically, > if he was an IDF >> officer, a cop, or if he lives in a dangerous area (the > gov't decides what is >> dangerous, and they make logical decisions, believe me), he > can get the >> license. Then he's got to go to an approved dealer to buy > the gun. Then he must >> do monthly target practice or risk having his license > revoked, and the weapon, >> which could cost hundreds of dollars, confiscated. >> >> I remind you, that this is ISRAEL, which is undergoing a > cruel war of attrition >> right now. >> >> Gunshot and violent crimes here are much more rare then > they are in the US. >> Part of the reason is that a weapon is hard to get. Part of > the reason, indeed, >> is cultural. >> >> Before the OSLO accords, signed in 1993, Palestinian > violence was primarily >> rocks being thrown, and the occasional bigger attack. Since > the accords were >> signed, and more to the point, since the Palestinian police > were given weapons >> by the Israelis, my children must go to school in BULLET- > PROOF buses. The >> Palestinians use the weapons freely against us, and even > use them at weddings - >> firing in the air in "celebration". >> >> An Israeli is VERY careful with the weapon he either has > bought, or was issued >> for his reserve duty. He must fill out a report and undergo > sometimes grueling >> interrogations by the Police (or the MP's) if he fires the > weapon. >> >> Many people where I live walk around with pistols in their > belts, and/or the >> Uzi or M-16. These are simple civilian residents of a > Jewish village in >> Samaria (aka West Bank). These people have the weapons > legally. In fact, the >> attack just a few days ago in Harmesh was stopped by people > with such weapons. >> >> Israel can be considered the valhalla for those who love > guns. >> >> BUT >> >> There is no 2nd Amendment, and there is no "right" to bear > arms. >> >> In the US, there is no "right" to drive, yet millions do. >> There is no "right" to be a doctor, yet there are many. >> There is no "right" to fly, yet there are many pilots. >> There is no "right" to be a pharmacist and sell potentially > deadly drugs, yet >> many are pharmacists. >> There is no "right" to be a prostitute, and in fact, it is > illegal in most >> places, EXCEPT certain areas of Nevada. >> >> In short, if the 2nd Amendment is repealed, each State and > locality can then >> set the weapons-use issue according to the customs and > mores of its own >> people. Even if there is no "right" to bear arms, this does > not mean that guns >> will be taken away from people. It only means that they > could (but not >> necessarily will) be monitored much more closely, which I > think will only help >> to reduce violent crime. >> >> Just my thoughts, >> >> Shmuel >>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- 2nd Amendment perspectives, 10/31/02, by Shmuel Goldstein.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 10/31/02, by rrr.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/07/02, by sharwinston.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/16/02, by Shmuel.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/16/02, by Shmuel.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 5/04/03, by shawn.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 5/04/03, by your perspective is flawed..
- Re: 2nd Amendment
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 11/02/03, by Kelvin.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 11/23/03, by Joel Clyde.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 12/13/03, by Ravage.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 3/18/04, by Alex.
- Re: 2nd Amendment perspectives, 2/10/05, by Shmuel Goldstein.
|